My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
APPCOR10146
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Application Correspondence
>
1000
>
APPCOR10146
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:26:34 PM
Creation date
11/19/2007 2:08:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981034
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
1/18/1982
Doc Name
TECHNICAL ADEQUACY REVIEW OF THE GRAND MESA COAL CO RED CANYON 1 & 2 MINES PERMIT APPLICATION
From
MLR
To
DAN MATHEWS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Dan Mathews -4- January 18, 1982 <br />5) Provide to the Division a hgdroloqu map on a legible contour mao. This <br />hydrologic map should contain the locations of streams, springs, wells, irrigation <br />ditches (i.e. main ditches, feeder ditches, and return flow ditches), head gates, <br />ponds, lakes, impoundments, monitoring wells, surface monitoring sites, and <br />complete watershed boundaries. <br />6) Conduct a mine inflow study. This inflow study is needed to assess the present <br />impacts of mining on groundwater. This inflow study should include: A) A map of <br />all mine inflows on an updated mine workings map; B) A table keyed to this map <br />with the source of inflows (i.e. faults, fractures, cleating, weeping roofs, <br />floors or walls, etc.), estimates or measurements of flow rates, and mine inflow <br />quality (i.e. pH, temperature, and electro-conductivity); C) A record of the amount <br />of water imported into the mine: D) The amount of water discharged and/or consumed <br />within the mine; and E) A narrative describing the occurance and handling of <br />water within the mine. <br />7) Cliaracterizeirrigation on, and within, the "Glacial-Alluvial Aquifer". The <br />subirrigation character of pasture and orchard lands located on the "Glacial- <br />Alluvial" deposits has not been adequately addressed by the applicant. Test <br />"- <br />' boring, test pits and continuous monitoring of water levels are needed to <br />characterize subirrigation within the "Glacial-Alluvial" deposits. <br />After collecting all of this site-specific data, the applicant should have the data <br />analyzed and should rewrite the hydrologic, alternative water supply systems <br />(water rights), and Alluvial Valley Floor sections of the permit application. <br />The following analyses should be prepared: <br />A. An evaluation of groundwater depletion in the coal seams and the "Glacial- <br />Alluvial Aquifer" induced by underground mining operations. <br />B. An evaluation of the effects of mining on stream flow depletion. <br />C. An evaluation of the effects of mining on subirrigation, surface irrigation <br />systems, irrigation return flows to Ward Creek, and productivity of irrigated <br />pasture and orchard Zands. <br />D. An evaluation of water rights held by Grand Mesa Coal Company, and the need <br />for augmentation of water supplies of other water right holders above and below <br />the permit area. An evaluation, should be made to determine if there is sufficient <br />water available in the Colby Domestic Water System to cover the loss of water to <br />well owners. <br />E. An evaluation of the effects of mining on ground and surface water quality <br />during and after mining. <br />During site inspections, Jim Herron has noted that monitoring wells at the mine <br />site are improperly installed. Perforated casings extend above ground allowing <br />surface waters to enter the well and bias both water levels and groundwater <br />quality. This situation can be remedied by digging down around the casing to a <br />depth of three feet, cutting off the perforated casing, gluing on a section of <br />solid casing, and filling the hole around the well to the surface with cement. <br />These monitoring wells should be fixed immediately to ensure that the data being <br />collected is valid. <br />Grand Mesa Coal Company should provide to the Division completion diagrams for <br />each monitoring well. This diagram should include the perforated or slotted, <br />casing interval, the solid casing interval, the location and type of formation packer <br />or seal, gravel packed interval, open hole interval, backfilled interval, and the <br />geologic units into which the well is completed. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.