My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
APPCOR10031
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Application Correspondence
>
1000
>
APPCOR10031
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:26:27 PM
Creation date
11/19/2007 2:07:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996083
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
8/4/1996
Doc Name
PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY BOWIE 2 MINE PN C-96-083
From
DMG
To
DAVE BERRY
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
.,;, .' <br />Memo to Dave Berry <br />Bowie No. 2 Geotech Study <br />page 6 <br /> <br />required compacted densities. Fills constructed to these higher density <br />standards, if wetted, could swell extensively disrupting their structure <br />and decreasing their shear strength significantly, resulting in structural <br />failure. Fills design and constructed to lesser shear strength standards <br />may have much greater likelihood of survival if wetted. <br />The author states; "Slope sections in the portal bench area generated <br />factors of safety in the range of 1.2 to 1.4, considered marginal to <br />acceptable for a project of this type." While these safety factors may be <br />considered acceptable in general engineering practice, the applicant must <br />meet the minimum slope stability safety factors specified throughout our <br />regulations. Among other specified requirements, all reclaimed surfaces <br />must meet a minimum static slope safety factor of 1.3. <br />Page 18 <br />In the only direct address of reclamation of the site, Maxim Technologies <br />states; "It is our opinion that returning the site to original grades will be <br />successful if the criteria for fill placement are followed. We do <br />not recommend placing permanent, reclaimed slopes at inclinations <br />steeper than 2H:1 V. The use of benches to control slope drainage and <br />erosion and promote revegetation should be incorporated into the <br />reclamation plan." The implications of this recommendation are <br />significant. First, every backfilled cut or reduced embankment will be <br />reworked as if a structural fill were being constructed. This includes <br />benching and scarifying of areas to receive backfill, complete compaction <br />and verification of fill density, proper drainage and storm water <br />management. Further, bonding will be required to complete all of this <br />work in the event of forfeiture, including monitoring to verify success. <br />Candidly, this is a standard that few mines have proposed to meet. <br />However, based on the preliminary materials information provided in this <br />report, I concur with Maxim's recommendation. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.