My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
INSPEC46262
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Inspection
>
INSPEC46262
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:49:09 PM
Creation date
11/18/2007 11:45:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1984008
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Date
3/16/2004
Doc Name
Response to Inspection
From
Southwestern Ecological Services
To
DMG
Inspection Date
2/20/2004
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 2 <br />Barnhart Inspection Response <br />March 15, 2004 <br />and proceed eastward across the property thus inducing a continued persistence of weed growth in the <br />highly disturbed soils. Furthermore, seed deposition along the fences creates a new generation of weeds the <br />next year that add even more weed seed to the soils. Although the operator cannot be responsible fox weed <br />infestations on adjacent properties, an aggressive control program on this property will still be necessary to <br />effectively reclaim the site, whether an amendment is successful ox not. <br />In short, there axe a number of issues that need to be addressed regarding this site in the process of <br />developing an amendment, not the least of which is the issue of Special Use Permitting. If you desire I can <br />keep you informed of progress on the amendment. Unfortunately, due to the complexity of the <br />amendment I am not able to provide you with a reliable estimate as to when that amendment would be <br />submitted, but tentatively I believe something should be ready by mid to late summer. At this time it <br />appears approaching the Special Use Permit issue first is the most important step. If the issues there cannot <br />be solved there is not a great deal of point in spending a great deal of time in creating a Reclamation Permit <br />amendment beyond that amount of planning required to address any county concerns regarding <br />reclamation issues. <br />If you have any questions, please call. <br />Sincerely, <br />~~~`~ <br />~~'/ V <br />Mark A. Heifnex <br />cc Jerry Hermans <br />B.J. Fuller <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.