My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
INSPEC45937
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Inspection
>
INSPEC45937
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:48:52 PM
Creation date
11/18/2007 11:44:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1989029
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Name
MINERALS PROGRAM INSPECTION REPORT
Inspection Date
4/26/2001
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~_ d ivy ; i :: /i, ) . 7r ~ ~ - i <br />RECEIVED <br />to Whom It May Concern: MAR 2 8 2001 <br />Division of Minerals and Geology <br />j <br />t <br />A <br />i <br />4 <br />i <br />i <br /> <br /> <br />I am writing this letter with my concerns about the <br />Camas L~SR 877 and USR 1046 permits. As you can see from my <br />scaled map, I live in Che middle of the Camas USRs. <br />What I would like to say first, I am not opposed to <br />responsible mining, I am opposed to unresponsible mining. <br />Re:~iewing the nap you can see that a possible 3.5 miles <br />of river ( St. Vrain and Boulder Creek) will be disrupted <br />for 15-20 years, not including the 14yrs. to present. I must <br />say agian I am not opposed to responsible mining. As you <br />can see on the map, a yellow marker showing the conveyer system <br />from C.L.Rd.#1 to the east end of section 16. This is my <br />opposition. Why as a property owner do we have to deal with <br />this ne,~ative impact. This does not have to happen. The USR <br />877 permit needs to be reclaimed, then the USR 1046 should <br />be mined. To have the St. Vrain-Boulder Creek confluence <br />mined a= the same time, it is to hard on the enviroment. <br />As neighbors, we have battled with the effects of the mining. <br />AIR QUALITY, NOISE, TRAFFIC, NEGATIVE PROPERTY VALUES, <br />ENVIROMI?NTAL EFFECTS, not to mention miles of unreclaimed <br />river bottom. This is not an attempt to stop the mining, <br />it is a~i attempt to get it under control before its to late. <br />The State of Colorado 34-32-102 Legislative Declaration <br />is not tieing conveyed to myself my family and or my neighbors. <br />~~'. <br />~n <br />Please take a close look at my concerns: <br />cc DMG Michael Long <br />' cc DOW Larry Rogstad <br />~ cc Longmont City Council Marty Block <br />cc Weld Co. Planning Ann Johnson <br />~~ <br />i <br />1 <br />Thanks Ted L. Cox <br />1767 WCR 20.5 <br />Longmont, Co 80504 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.