Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />INSPECTION REPORT -2- <br />FIIE N0. 74-4 <br />GATE: u Y 983 <br />6. The southern most gulch area has a scrap stockpile across the drainage area <br />The hillside north of the gulch is steeper than 2:1, barren of vegetation, <br />eroding and apparently ready for final grade and permanent revegetation. <br />No sedimentation problem exists due to the presence of a ;acre (approx.) <br />settling basin. <br />While it is apparent that a considerable amount of overburden exists on the <br />site. The operator has only accomplished a minimal amount of stockpiling. <br />.In Mr. Hickman's March 22, 1982 letter, he states that a total of 157,106 <br />cubic yards of soil will be stockpiled in Jackson Gulch and that the maximum <br />amount of disturbance at any one time is 97 acres. The 1983 annual report <br />indicates 104 acres have been affected during the year. Exactly where is <br />the 157,106 cubic yards of soil? To prevent loss, the operatoi° must place <br />this topsoil in a stockpile and protect this soil from wind and water erosion. <br />Please proved a map showing the location of the stockpile or p files and the <br />quantity to be place in each. Also, please provide a timetable for carrying <br />out this salvage. <br />The operator must <br />built as outlined <br />Please include a <br />the timetable for <br />'JBM:PVOClpJh <br />address why water retention ponds No. 1 and 2 have not been <br />in the amendment application submitted on February 1, 1982. <br />map showing where these ponds will be constructed along with <br />construction. <br />/ep <br />(1/83) <br />Doc. No. 153 <br />