My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
INSPEC44684
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Inspection
>
INSPEC44684
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:47:50 PM
Creation date
11/18/2007 11:38:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1994117
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Date
12/1/1997
Doc Name
COMMENTS ANALYTICAL RESULTS REPORT SITE INSPECTION GOLD HILL TAILING SITE COLO SPGS CO EPA ID COD983
From
DMG
To
EPA 8 M/C
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
_. <br />• <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Dcl ~,tnmenl of Natural Resources <br />I l l }Sherman 51., Ronm ? I S <br />Denver, Colorado 8020] <br />Phnn¢ (1011 Bbfi-1567 <br />FA7: 1311 N N}!-NI OG <br />December 1. 1997 <br />Ms. Pat Smith <br />EPA - 8 M/C <br />999 18th St Ste 500 <br />Denver, CO 80202-2466 <br />~~~ <br />fJEPARTMENT OF <br />NATURAL <br />RESOURCES <br />Rnv knmr~ <br />Gnrrrnur <br />Limes 1. Lie hhrad <br />Fey uuvc Dur%nn <br />hli~hae B Lune; <br />Diri~inn DImUp! <br />RE: Comments, Analytical Results Report, Site Inspection, Gold Hill Tailings Site, Colorado <br />Springs, CO, EPA ID# COD983801275 <br />Dear N1s- ,th,~`'~ <br />Thank you for the package on the Gold Hill Tailings Site, which contained the following <br />documents: <br />1. Analytical Results Report, Site Inspection, Gold Hill Tailings Site, October 14, 1994, <br />EPA ID# COD983801275 and <br />2. Sampling Activities and Analytical Results Report, TDD #T08-9501-012 April 14, <br />1995. <br />We discussed this site a couple of weeks ago with regazd to a proposal by a company who <br />appazently have acquired a process for re-mining the tailings and therefore may be interested in <br />starting a mining operation. We have not heazd from that company, so assume they are either <br />still in the exploratory phase or have re-assessed the economics of the situation. <br />As I had indicated, the issue of re-mining is currently being discussed by our Mined Land <br />Reclamation Board. At issue is whether the Board has the authority to regulate the processing or <br />re-processing of earthen materials that are not being removed from their "natural state." This <br />issue will be discussed at this month's board hearing. <br />Regarding the information packet, I looked for indications of possible water quality impacts on <br />either surface or groundwater. There is some indication of possible local impacts to groundwater <br />although this cannot be verified from the data; a couple of wet! samples had high lead, but <br />whether this is related to plumbing is not evident from the information. Also, sediments in <br />Fountain Creek evidently contained elevated metals, relative to upstream samples, but whether <br />this is a cause for toxicity cannot be told from the data. There is not really any useable surface <br />water quality data because the surface water samples were collected during high flow, so if there <br />are surface water impacts from the Golden Cycle Mill tailings, they may be masked by the <br />~-9~ ~r~ <br />CTOTC ~ COLORADO <br />III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII ~.~, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.