My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
INSPEC44602
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Inspection
>
INSPEC44602
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:47:46 PM
Creation date
11/18/2007 11:37:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Date
7/15/1997
Doc Name
SPECIAL FOCUS SURFACE WATER HYDROLOGY TRAPPER MINE PN C-81-010 TRAPPER MINING INC
From
DMG
To
OSM
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Probable Hydrologic Cousequences <br />With the 1996 Annual Report, the operator has reorganized the Probable Hydrologic <br />Consequences (PHC) section of the permit application. This reorganization was a result of the <br />OSM 1996 Special Focus Inspection. Rule 2.05.6(3xb)(iii) requires that the permit application <br />address the potential impacts to the hydrologic regime from mining. These impacts rteed to be <br />discussed for the period while mining is taking place and when the entire site has been reclaimed. <br />The submittal, dated April ] 7, 1997, discusses only predicted impacts after mining has ceased. <br />Therefore, the following question needs to be resolved. <br />15. Please add a discussion in the PHC concerning anticipated impacts to the hydrologic <br />regime, as required in section 2.05.6(3)(b)(iii) of the Rules, for the time that mining is <br />taking place. <br />Surface Water <br />The PHC section concerning surface water quantity predictions, on page 4-237 of the April 17, <br />1997 submittal, does not contain any attempt at quantifying future runoff predictions. The <br />Division agrees that such a quantification is difficult, but, may be possible in the general sense <br />using hydrologic modeling techniques that use curve numbers for runoff. Therefore, the Division <br />poses question no. 16. <br />16. Please add a discussion on page 4-237 of the April 17, 1997 submittal, that attempts to <br />quantify the surface runoff predictions for the period during mining and after mining. <br />The April 17, 1997 PHC predicts that the postmine surface water quality will show elevated <br />levels of TSS, but that the sediment ponds will prevent such elevated TSS levels from going <br />offsite. No discussion is presented for the postmine situation after the sediment ponds are <br />removed. Therefore, question no. 17 is posed. <br />17. Please add a discussion, on page 4-237 of the April 17, 1997 PHC submittal, that predicts <br />the general TSS levels leaving the mine site after the sediment ponds aze reclaimed. <br />The PHC predicts that total iron and manganese levels will continue to be high intermittently <br />after mining. Also, it is anticipated that the pH levels after mining ceases will be about the same <br />as they have been and aze now. Finally, TDS levels are expected to rise for a few years after <br />mining, then fall back to premise levels. Nothing in the 1996 Annual Report data seems to <br />contradict these predictions. Concerning the Yampa River, the PHC correctly states that most of <br />the flow off of the mine site does not make it to the river. Therefore, no discernible impacts to <br />the Yampa River from mining operations are anticipated. <br />One hydrologic issue fromTechnical Revision No. 66 that remains to be fully resolved is the <br />issue of full suite water quality sampling of surface water runoff from a disturbed area, even <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.