My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
INSPEC44079
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Inspection
>
INSPEC44079
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:47:20 PM
Creation date
11/18/2007 11:34:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1992080
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Name
Inspection Report
Inspection Date
4/29/2003
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
III. COMMENTS -COMPLIANCE <br />Below are comments on the inspection. The comments include discussion of observations made during the <br />inspection. Comments also describe any enforcement actions taken during the inspection and the facts or evidence <br />supporting the enforcement action. <br />This partial inspection of the Carbon Junction Coal Mine was conducted by DMG staff from the <br />DMG Durango Office, 701 Camino del Rio, Room 125, Durango, CO 81301, phone (970) 247- <br />5469. No individuals were contacted during the inspection. Reclamation equipment was <br />present but temporarily dormant. Evidence of recent reclamation activity was observed at the <br />south highwall and north highwall area. <br />Mine identification sign was posted at the mine entrance. Permit boundary markers were <br />posted. Topsoil stockpile signs were posted. <br />Backfill and grading of the south highwall to approximate 3H:1 V slope appeared near <br />completion. Topsoil, previously distributed on the rock fill area, was being salvaged to allow <br />additional grading to the rock fill area. Grading of coal refuse material and importation of <br />earthen cover materials had recently occurred at the north highwall area. <br />Sediment Pond 1, located at the far south end of the permit area, was dry, no discharge noted. <br />The pond embankment, inslopes and bottom were well vegetated and stable. Primary and <br />secondary spillways appeared to be clear of sediment and debris, and capable of functioning as <br />designed. Roadside drainage ditches and culverts, conveying affected area drainageto Pond 1, <br />were well maintained. <br />Sediment Pond 2, located along the west side of the permit area, was dry, no discharge noted. <br />The pond embankment, inslopes and bottom were well vegetated and stable. Primary and <br />secondary spillways appeared intact and capable of functioning as designed. Evidence of <br />erosion and sedimentation was observed at the pond inlet. Rock check dams were intact forthe <br />upper portions of the inlet ditch. Maintenance clean out of sediment between the check dams <br />appears necessary to ensure their continued function and to ensure adequate capacity for the <br />ditch. Evidence of erosion was observed in the steep slope portions of the ditch. Maintenance <br />of the rock check dams for the steep portions of the ditch appears necessary to ensure stability <br />of the ditch and pond inlet. Evidence of sediment escaping the sediment containment structure <br />was not observed. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.