Laserfiche WebLink
• (Page 2) • <br />MINE ID # OR PROSPECTING ID # M-86-109 <br />INSPECTION DATE 11-16-98 INSPECTOR'S INITIALS ACS <br />On November 12, 1998, B & B Excavating notified the Division of Minerals and Geology that two or three <br />55-gallon drums of herbicide had been emptied onto a crushed gravel stockpile at the Montgomery PiC. <br />This inspection was conducted to gather information on this incident, and to develop a corrective <br />action plan to assess and address any potential adverse environmental impacts. <br />Initially, a meeting was held at the B & B office in Edwards. Representing B & B at the Meeting and <br />at the subsequent site inspection were Scott Hoover, B & B's General Manager, Peter Rudy, General <br />Counsel, and Chris Thorne and Paul Phillips, attorneys with the firm of Holland and Hart. Information <br />on the herbicide in question was distributed, including the Material Safety Data Sheet. The herbicide <br />dumped onto the gravel pile is believed by B & B to have been REPCO KILL II manufactured by Amrep, <br />Inc., Cartersville, Georgia. Repro Kill II is a soil sterilant of 2 percent 2,9-D and 2 percent <br />Bromacil in a petroleum distillate base. 2,4-D breaks down relatively quickly in water and has low <br />soil persistence. However, 2,4-D has been detected in ground and surface water throughout the United <br />States, and the Colorado Water Quality Control Commission has established a ground water standard of <br />70 micrograms per liter. 2,A-D does not bioaccumulate, and is slightly toxic to wildfowl and slightly <br />to moderately toxic to birds. Some formulations of 2,4-D are highly toxic to fish while others are <br />less so. Bromacil is a persistent and highly mobile herbicide. It binds, or adsorbs, only slightly <br />to soil particles, does not readily volatilize, nor does it break down in sunlight. Bromacil can be <br />expected to leach quite readily through the soil and contaminate ground water. Bromacil is practically <br />nontoxic to birds, slightly to practically nontoxic to fish, and nontoxic to aquatic invertebrates. No <br />ground water standard has been established for bromacil, but EPA has established a lifetime health <br />advisory level at 90 micrograms per liter. <br />A written chronology of events was distributed and discussed at the meeting. A description and summary <br />of events, as the Division understands them, is provided here. Currently, the crusher is located on <br />the west side of the Montgomery Pit permit area, and the hot plant is located to the east. '/. inch <br />minus crushed gravel is hauled from the crusher to a stockpile area just north of the asphalt plant <br />where it is screened into ',5 inch minus road base to feed the plant and '/. inch rock. In July 1998, two <br />or three drums of Repro Kill II, which was past its expiration date, were reportedly emptied into the <br />top of the y. inch minus crushed gravel stockpile. The contaminated gravel was then screened to make <br />',5 inch road base, which remained in a stockpile until November 6, 1998. On November 6, 1998, B and B <br />asphalt crew workers reported weed killer smell coming from the asphalt. <br />On November 7, 1998, the asphalt plant was shut down and the stockpile suspected to contain the <br />herbicide was cordoned off with caution tape. Notifications were made to the national Response Center, <br />the Colorado emergency response center, and Eagle County. On November 9, 1998, the consulting firm of <br />Dames and Moore was engaged to complete an environmental and health evaluation of the incident. Dames <br />and Moore personnel were on-site November 11 and 12, 1998 and collected characterization samples on <br />November 12, 1998. On November 12, 1998, silt fence was installed to further barricade the potentially <br />contaminated stockpile. <br />B and B reports that their air emission permit for the hot plant allows oil stained soils resulting <br />from incidental spills to be run through the plant for disposal. Apparently, a worker or workers at <br />the Montgomery Pit decided that it would be acceptable to dump the herbicide onto the hot plant feed <br />gravel since the herbicide carrier is #2 diesel, so running diesel soaked gravel into the plant would <br />be similar to running oil stained soil. Obviously, to the extent possible all petroleum products must <br />be contained in drums or tanks and all spills cleaned up when they occur. The faulty logic that led <br />to application of 2 or 3 drums of herbicide in diesel fuel to a gravel pile on a potentially pervious <br />substrate adjacent to the Eagle River indicates that there must be additional environmental training <br />of B and B employees. This issue is discussed further below. <br />A t~che request of the Division, B and B provided copies of the Montgomery Pit Storm Water Management <br />Plan and Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasure Plan. An inspection of the Montgomery Pit was <br />conducted, and the following observations were made: <br />