• (Page 2) •
<br />MINE ID # OR PROSPECTING ID # M-86-109
<br />INSPECTION DATE 11-16-98 INSPECTOR'S INITIALS ACS
<br />On November 12, 1998, B & B Excavating notified the Division of Minerals and Geology that two or three
<br />55-gallon drums of herbicide had been emptied onto a crushed gravel stockpile at the Montgomery PiC.
<br />This inspection was conducted to gather information on this incident, and to develop a corrective
<br />action plan to assess and address any potential adverse environmental impacts.
<br />Initially, a meeting was held at the B & B office in Edwards. Representing B & B at the Meeting and
<br />at the subsequent site inspection were Scott Hoover, B & B's General Manager, Peter Rudy, General
<br />Counsel, and Chris Thorne and Paul Phillips, attorneys with the firm of Holland and Hart. Information
<br />on the herbicide in question was distributed, including the Material Safety Data Sheet. The herbicide
<br />dumped onto the gravel pile is believed by B & B to have been REPCO KILL II manufactured by Amrep,
<br />Inc., Cartersville, Georgia. Repro Kill II is a soil sterilant of 2 percent 2,9-D and 2 percent
<br />Bromacil in a petroleum distillate base. 2,4-D breaks down relatively quickly in water and has low
<br />soil persistence. However, 2,4-D has been detected in ground and surface water throughout the United
<br />States, and the Colorado Water Quality Control Commission has established a ground water standard of
<br />70 micrograms per liter. 2,A-D does not bioaccumulate, and is slightly toxic to wildfowl and slightly
<br />to moderately toxic to birds. Some formulations of 2,4-D are highly toxic to fish while others are
<br />less so. Bromacil is a persistent and highly mobile herbicide. It binds, or adsorbs, only slightly
<br />to soil particles, does not readily volatilize, nor does it break down in sunlight. Bromacil can be
<br />expected to leach quite readily through the soil and contaminate ground water. Bromacil is practically
<br />nontoxic to birds, slightly to practically nontoxic to fish, and nontoxic to aquatic invertebrates. No
<br />ground water standard has been established for bromacil, but EPA has established a lifetime health
<br />advisory level at 90 micrograms per liter.
<br />A written chronology of events was distributed and discussed at the meeting. A description and summary
<br />of events, as the Division understands them, is provided here. Currently, the crusher is located on
<br />the west side of the Montgomery Pit permit area, and the hot plant is located to the east. '/. inch
<br />minus crushed gravel is hauled from the crusher to a stockpile area just north of the asphalt plant
<br />where it is screened into ',5 inch minus road base to feed the plant and '/. inch rock. In July 1998, two
<br />or three drums of Repro Kill II, which was past its expiration date, were reportedly emptied into the
<br />top of the y. inch minus crushed gravel stockpile. The contaminated gravel was then screened to make
<br />',5 inch road base, which remained in a stockpile until November 6, 1998. On November 6, 1998, B and B
<br />asphalt crew workers reported weed killer smell coming from the asphalt.
<br />On November 7, 1998, the asphalt plant was shut down and the stockpile suspected to contain the
<br />herbicide was cordoned off with caution tape. Notifications were made to the national Response Center,
<br />the Colorado emergency response center, and Eagle County. On November 9, 1998, the consulting firm of
<br />Dames and Moore was engaged to complete an environmental and health evaluation of the incident. Dames
<br />and Moore personnel were on-site November 11 and 12, 1998 and collected characterization samples on
<br />November 12, 1998. On November 12, 1998, silt fence was installed to further barricade the potentially
<br />contaminated stockpile.
<br />B and B reports that their air emission permit for the hot plant allows oil stained soils resulting
<br />from incidental spills to be run through the plant for disposal. Apparently, a worker or workers at
<br />the Montgomery Pit decided that it would be acceptable to dump the herbicide onto the hot plant feed
<br />gravel since the herbicide carrier is #2 diesel, so running diesel soaked gravel into the plant would
<br />be similar to running oil stained soil. Obviously, to the extent possible all petroleum products must
<br />be contained in drums or tanks and all spills cleaned up when they occur. The faulty logic that led
<br />to application of 2 or 3 drums of herbicide in diesel fuel to a gravel pile on a potentially pervious
<br />substrate adjacent to the Eagle River indicates that there must be additional environmental training
<br />of B and B employees. This issue is discussed further below.
<br />A t~che request of the Division, B and B provided copies of the Montgomery Pit Storm Water Management
<br />Plan and Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasure Plan. An inspection of the Montgomery Pit was
<br />conducted, and the following observations were made:
<br />
|