INSPEC43794 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Seneca R Mine Phase I bond rele«se, uu. 2 We also discussed inspection oC stn~ctures approved by DRMS for permanent retention to facilitate the post mining land use of rangeland including livestock watering tanks, permanent water impoundments, and roads. Nlr. Karo and Mr. James provided inspection participants with letters from the affected surface landowners (State of Colorado Land Board, Grassy Creek Holding Co. LLC, and Seneca Coal Co.) requesting permanent retention of the above structures. These letters satisfied Stipulation 32 of DRMS Technical Revision 37 (TR-37). Throughout the inspection days (Aug. 7, through 11) we made observations of approximate original contour (aog) restoration, surface water runoff control and surface erosional stability, and retention of permanent structures as we walked all the pm channels. Approximate original contour restoration observed throughout the reclaimed areas closely resembles the pre mining landscape, and blends extremely well into surrounding undisturbed areas. The essential hydrologic functions recreated by the pm channels resembles the pre mining landscape, helps provide stability for sur.`ace water runoff and reclaimed slopes, and facilitates the post mining land use of rangeland. We took slope measurements in several areas along pm channels, reclaimed slopes, and roadways. We began the field inspection mid afternoon on August 7 at the head of pm 6a & 6b, and walked its entire length making the observations noted above. Observations and subsequent stops & observations during the inspection are as follows: Upper pm 6 (6a & 6b} has an open sink hole on the west facing slope approximately 40 feet below the cattle gate on the retained road. This sink hole is noted on the annual rill & gully survey and needs to be backfilled. The upper pm 6 main channel above the stock tank should be evaluated for hand repair and/or additional rip rap placement to ensure stability of the east channel bank. We measured a representative slope in the pm 6 channel at the F road crossing at 14%. The permittee should monitor the minor rill & gully development in mid to upper pm 6 below the F road on the east side of the channel. The next slope measurement in pm 6 was below the minor rills at bend in channel at 9%. The channel appears stable between the bend noted above and the entrance road. Slope measured in pm 6 channel in the lower reach above the entrance road at 16%. This concluded the inspecfion for August 7. We begatr the inspectior, August 8 with Mr. Boulay and Mrs. Brown walking all of pm 4, and Mr. Boulay's inspection report will reflect those observations. I joined them and we continued the inspection beginning at pm 1, upper Grassy Creek. We measured the channel slope in upper Grassy Creek at 3%. Below here and below the rip rap reach there was some ditch maintenance where wet material was cast to the north side of the channel. This material should be seeded and/or graded and seeded. We took the f road to stock tank t33, the stock tank and spillway are stable. The spoil spring below the spillway was not flowing at all that we could observe. PM 18, 19, and 3 that drain into t33 are stable as are the surrounding slopes. PM 5 was inspected and is stable. We inspected pm 23 above the Pecoco pond. There is a small settlement crack that has reformed after previous maintenance grading that requires hand maintenance. The pm 2 vegetated channel appears stable.