Laserfiche WebLink
III. COMMENTS -COMPLIANCE <br />Below are comments on the inspection. The comments include discussion of observations made during the inspection. Commenls <br />olso describe any enforcement actions taken during the inspection and the facts of evidence supporting the enforcement action. <br />This inspection started off with a meeting (at 08:40) at the offices ofHydro-Environmental Solutions, Inc., <br />with John Weinman (Weinman). Weinman was invited to accompany Byron G. Walker (of the Division of <br />Minerals and Geology) on the physical inspection of the Hayden Gulch Mine. Weinman declined. The <br />physical inspection was initiated at 09:30. <br />This mine has gone through Phase I on all disturbed areas, and Phase II and III Bond Release on all but <br />approximately 8.9 acres. The permit boundary was reduced to enclose 8.9 acres. These acres consist of <br />four separate parcels: three aze designated as shrub azeas and one a (former and reclaimed) slide area. The <br />repaired slide azea is to be checked for Phase I compliance. <br />The site was covered by about three feet of snow. All observations were from Routt County Road 53. <br />SIGNS AND MARKERS <br />The only mine identification signs that could be observed from the road was at Pazcels 003 and JG-8 <br />(south end of west side). The signs were in compliance with the rules, and were in good repair. <br />HYDROLOGIC BALANCE <br />The site was covered by snow. No runoff was visible. <br />FISH AND WILDLIFE <br />Elk fencing about Pazcels 003 and HG-8 was in good repair. The fencing about Parcel E could not be <br />seen from the road. <br />SLIDES AND DAMAGE <br />No slides or damage were noted through the snow cover. <br />CP Inspection of 15 Mazch 2006, C-1980-003, Page 3 of4 pages. BGW <br />