Laserfiche WebLink
Binns, Janet <br />From: Ray Barker[rbarker@epkbenefits.comj <br />Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2004 12:05 AM <br />To: daniel.hernandez@state.co.us; janet.binns@state.co.us <br />Cc: mhook@fghr.com <br />Subject: FW: DMG Points of discussion <br />From: Brad Barker [mailto:bbarker188@earthlink.net] <br />Sent: Mon 2/2/04 9:37 PM <br />To: Ray Barker <br />Subject: DMG Points of discussion <br />Dan and Janet <br />A request I have is in relation to our property in Colorado and following upon the inforation sent yesterday. I don't want <br />RAG to do anything other than what they originally planned to do in a reclamation plan that RAG originally submitted. <br />Eventually, my plans are to utilize the property in ways other than strictly agricultural. However the way the land was to <br />be put back together as agricultural land is exactly the way I would like it to be, which means I am not asking RAG to do <br />anything other than what they had originally promised to do with the land. Some questions have been raised about the <br />maps I sent they all came from the reclamation maps sent to me on a CD. Below I have gone back and located the <br />names from the maps for your reference. <br />Subsequent to the emails and pictures I sent yesterday. I received a call from Colorado (7pm monday night), and was an <br />informed that the scope of work on the property has even more magnified - to the point where they have dirt stacked up <br />against the previously untouched rock walls above the mine opening. They are also apparently cutting away ground, <br />which has previously never been disturbed by the Mining operations. All this activity only heightens my concerns over <br />what RAG is doing and how it is impacting my property. <br />Again I will reiterate that it is not my desire to prevent reclamation, however I truly do not believe that what is going on at <br />the mine site, above and beyond trespass, can be considered normal and prudent reclamation. I do not mean to sound <br />inpatient, but I am concerned that the damage being done may prove difficult or impossible to correct at a later date. <br />Again I believe the work they are doing is not congruent with the original reclamation plan, but if for some reason I have <br />dated material or am wrong in my beliefs, I most certainly like to request that the reclamation to continue in a different <br />manner. <br />Below are the maps I used in the email I sent to you and Janet Monday morning. Also see the attached for additional <br />information. <br />Exhibit A; L2YODIAL reclamation map <br />Exhibit B. ASBVAS7R surface ownership <br />Exhibit C. JNYHC5YG Williams Fork alluvium <br />Exhibit D. CY@@TA&W structures and renewable resources (date 2000) <br />Exhibit E. Photograph, with property lines superimposed. <br />Brad Barker 206.650.0290 <br />bbarker188Ca~earthlink.net <br />2/3/2004 <br />