Laserfiche WebLink
III. COMMENTS -COMPLIANCE <br />Below are comments on the inspection. The comments include discussion of observations made <br />during the inspection. Comments also describe any enforcement actions taken during the inspection <br />and the facts or evidence supporting the enforcement action. <br />On the 19th of July, 1997, William J. Carter from the Division of Minerals and Geology, accompanied <br />by Tom Anderson and Mark Milner, representing Oxbow Carbon and Minerals, performed a complete <br />inspection at the Sanborn Creek Mine. The day of the inspection was clear and warm, but during the <br />night before there had been a significant rain. Due to the rain the night before, Elk Creek was running <br />muddy due to natural erosion above the mine site. <br />Availability of Records: <br />• An updated insurance form is in the records, however, it is in the process of being corrected to <br />comply with the regulations. <br />• Records are available in the mine office, and were found to be up-to-date, except for the item <br />noted above. <br />Roads: <br />• The Delta County road up Hubbard Creek shows additional indications of moving. This is <br />likely to cause slides that will make the road impassable during the winter months. <br />• The remainder of the roads at this mine were found to be stable and in good condition. <br />Hydrologic Balance: <br />• Due to the rainfall the night before this inspection, one of the silt fences along the road up Elk <br />Creek was found to be filled with sediment. It does not appear to have allowed any significant <br />sediment to move beyond this point. Efforts were underway during this inspection to clean and <br />return this silt fence to full function. <br />• Several of the ditches show some impairment to flow due to the sediment and rock fall from the <br />above mentioned rain. All of these ditches were still totally functional during the inspection, <br />and were scheduled to be cleaned to guarantee that should another such event occur they could <br />continue to handle the runoff. <br />• Pond A contained some water but was well below the primary discharge point. <br />• Pond B contained water just at the primary discharge point but was not dischazging. <br />• The east yard pond did not contain any free water. <br />• The mine pond continues to dischazge cleaz water. <br />• The sediment pond at substation number three was dry at the time of this inspection. <br />Revegetation: <br />Revegetation at both the Lower Hubbard Creek and Bear Creek sites appear to be progressing as <br />expected. <br />Slides and Damaee: <br />Both the Lower Hubbard Creek and Bear Creek sites appear to be stable and do not show any <br />significant erosion at [his time. <br />Others: <br />Weed control at all the mine sites are effective at this time, although County roads passing through <br />some of the mine sites, such as the one going up Hubbard Creek are heavenly infested with noxious <br />