My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
INSPEC41542
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Inspection
>
INSPEC41542
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:45:24 PM
Creation date
11/18/2007 11:21:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977342
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Name
MINERALS PROGRAM INSPECTION REPORT
Inspection Date
10/30/1995
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~ ~~ • (Page 2) <br />MINE ID / OR PROSPECTING ID ~` M-77-342 <br />INSPECTION DATE 10/30/95 INSPECTOR'S INITIALS ACS <br />OBSERVATIONS <br />New Water Treatment Pond <br />Henderson Mine ie constructing an additional treatment pond that will be ueed in aeries or <br />parallel with the existing pond system ueed to treat water collected and pumped from the <br />underground workings. The mine dewatering and water treatment system at the Henderson Mine <br />has been designated an Environmental Protection Facility in the Environmental Protection Plan <br />submitted for the Henderson Mine, and currently under review by the Givieion. Design <br />drawings and information for the pond were submitted for Division review on September 5, <br />1995. In a telephone conversation on September 5, 1995, the Division provided acceptance of <br />the proposed pond ae an Environmental Protection Facility component, based on the drawings <br />and information provided. The Division stipulated that the operator analyze! a representative <br />sample of the pond foundation soils for shear strength in order to verify design assumptions <br />regarding stability of the pond aide elopes. It was agreed that a consolidated/undrained <br />triaxial test with pore pressure measurement would be conducted on a sample of the pond <br />foundation soils. <br />Titan Environmental, Englewood, Colorado ie the design, quality aseuranaa, and certifying <br />engineer for the pond installation. John Lupo, with Titan Environmental, was present for <br />part of this inspection. Colorado Lining Company, Parker, Colorado ie the lining contractor <br />for the pond installation. Michael Bair, with Colorado Lining Company, was present for part <br />of this inspection. <br />The pond had been excavated and bermed at the time of this inspection, but liner installation <br />had not yet commenced. John Lupo reported that the pond had been .installed to the <br />approximate lines and grade detailed in the design drawings. Changes in the design <br />incorporated during construction are addition of a flume at the pond inlet works, and <br />incorporation of a diversion box at the outlet works that allows pond effluent to be directed <br />to either of the existing ponds 1.1 or 2. The new pond is primarily an incised pond, with <br />only some low berming on the north and east aides. John Lupo reported that the pond berms <br />were constructed by placing thin horizontal lifts, and compacting with heavy equipment and <br />a eheepsfoot until the berms were brought to design grade. The material removed from the <br />pond excavation was piled in several locations around the site. Anne Ih:~enfeldt reported <br />that the piles will be seeded this year, and silt fences will be erected .around the piles. <br />Characterization and final disposition of the piled material will occur next year. Some of <br />the dirt may be suitable for use ae a top dressing/plant growth medium for reclamation. <br />The pond will be lined using 40 Mil HDPE, which will be anchored into trenches 3 feet deep <br />by 2 feet wide, located 5 feet from the pond in-elope on the pond perirtieters. Pressure <br />testing of fusion welds, and vacuum testing of extrusion welds was diecut~sed with Michael <br />Bair. For fusion weld pressure teat e, the Division requires verification that an intact air <br />channel exists for the length of the weld being tested. This can be accomplished by blowing <br />air into the channel, and verifying that the pressurized air is exiting t:he opposite end, <br />also by sealing the channel at both ends, pressurizing the channel and metering the.preeeure <br />at one end, then cutting a alit in the channel at the un-metered end and verifying that the <br />pressure immediately drops at the meter, or, as suggested by Michael Bair, in thinner liners, <br />such as the 40 Mil HDPE to be used here, the channel will visibly bulge when pressurized and <br />the technician can verify that the bulged area ie continuous. For vacuum testing, the <br />Division requires that technicians carefully overlap inspected areas when the vacuum testing <br />apparatus is moved, eo that absolutely 100 percent of each extrusion weld or suspect area is <br />examined through the vacuum apparatus glass. <br />The pond subgrade preparation was reviewed. Laborers were removing rocks: from the coarse <br />Band subgrade at the time of this inspection. The Division requires that the prepared <br />subgrade be smooth and free of all rocks, atones, sticks, roots, sharp objects, or debris of <br />any kind. No standing water or excessive moisture is allowed in the liner subgrade. The <br />installation contractor shall certify in writing that the surface on which the membrane ie <br />to be installed is acceptable before commencing work, and this certification.must be included <br />in the final certification report to the Division. <br />Also, the operator will provide a plan-view depicting the location and configuration of each <br />HDPE panel as it was installed. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.