My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
INSPEC41239
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Inspection
>
INSPEC41239
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:45:12 PM
Creation date
11/18/2007 11:20:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1983058
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Date
5/5/1998
Doc Name
COAL INSPECTION REPORT
Inspection Date
4/27/1998
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Below ere ao®~s on tl~e irepaYioo. 'Ibe m®ems mch~de diabassion of a6eavetioav made ~uuvig rho m4peaiaa <br />Co®e~ oleo deam~be coy eafao~mt actiame uk®duriog the ioipedian and tha fade or evidence supporting the <br />ead'oro®art action. <br />This was a partial inspection of the Twin Pines No. 2 Mine based on aerial photographs of the site <br />taloen Apri127, 1998. The permit for' the site has been revoked, but was reclaimed by the operator prior <br />to revocation. _ <br />The Coal Sales area slopes appeared to be stable and well vegetated. No erosional features~vere <br />evident The sedimentation pond held water, but it was not apparent whether it was above or below the <br />discharge level. <br />The No. 2 Mine area slopes appeared to be stable, with no signs of cracking or slumping. Vegetation <br />on the reclaimed areas appeared to be fYiirly thin. Light erosion was apparel on the reclaimed waste <br />pile. The mine beach sedimentation pond appeared to be dry. <br />~ ~3-oS~ <br />4'z~~9~' <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.