Laserfiche WebLink
._._ <br />iii iiiiiiiiiiiii iii <br />999 ~_ = <br />United States Department of the Interior <br />OFFICE OF SURFACE M1tiNING ~ <br />RECLAMATION AND ENFORCEMENT ~~ i <br />SUITE 310 <br />6°5 SILVER AVENUE, S.t1'. <br />In Reply Rehr To: <br />ALBUQUERQUE. NE11' MEJi1C0 87102 <br />December 16, 1989 <br />Permit: C-034-f1 <br />Mine Name: Grassy (.nn <br />A]r, Michael B. Long, Goal Program Supervisor <br />btined Land Reclamation Division <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />215 Centennial Building <br />1313 Sherman Screec <br />Denver. CO 80203 <br />Dear Mr. Long: <br />~~~~tl~~~ <br />DEC 201989 <br />MINED LAt~p <br />REC:AMAT-Cr< D+vrSlO~t <br />The enclosed Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (OS^1) <br />inspection report identifies violations that are considered to have <br />e::isted at the time of the previous State complete inspection but hacl <br />not been cited. <br />Date of Federal lnspection:, 11-30-89; Date of LSCI: 10-2C-84 <br />Tl~e determination that the State did not cite the violations is based on <br />one or more of the following reasons: <br />The condition was identified in a State inspection report but no <br />State enforcement action was taken. <br />Design criteria or required certification has not been met for a <br />structure in existence as of the last complete inspection <br />(sediment pond, excess spoil fill, etc.). <br />Necessary controls that were reouired at the time o` the list <br />complete State inspection have not been estab'_isned (diversion <br />ditches, sediment ponds, top soil protection, signs and mari:er=_, <br />etc.). <br />?' Site conditions indicate that the violations noted had been in <br />existence ac the time of, or prior to, the last complete State <br />insnection. <br />Other (give explanation). <br />:'~.lthough the violations were cited b}' the State, or were abated dutin~; r <br />joint insnection, OSM believes that the violations were evident during <br />the last complete insnection. <br />