My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
INSPEC40802
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Inspection
>
INSPEC40802
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:44:53 PM
Creation date
11/18/2007 11:18:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977215
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Date
3/15/1994
Doc Name
BULLDOG MINE HYDROLOGIC EVALUATION
From
CANONIE ENVIRONMENTAL
To
ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />r <br />Mr. Luke Russell 3 <br />March 15, 1994 <br />Table 3 <br />Alternative Windy Gulch Design Criteria <br /> <br /> <br />Design <br />Flow (cfs) <br /> <br />Channel <br />Slope (ft/ft) <br /> <br />Side Slope <br />H:V <br />Existing <br />Bottom <br />Width (ft) <br />Required <br />Bottom <br />Width (ft) Required <br />Maximum <br />Stone Size <br />(inches) <br />360 0.10 1:1 4 12 30 <br /> 1:1 30 30 i 13 <br /> 1:2 18 18 17 <br /> 0.25 1:2 18 28 24 <br />To my knowledge, rock riprap over approximately 14-16 inches is not readily available <br />within or in close proximity to the mine area. Anew quarry may be required to access <br />large rock riprap meeting the requirements of a 360 cfs runoff event as shown in <br />Table 3. This may entail additional permitting activities from the Forest Service and/or <br />other government regulatory agencies having jurisdiction near the Bulldog Mine. <br />In summary, I believe using the criteria in Table 1 for upgrading the channel will <br />provide adequate protection against channel erosion, headcutting and undercutting of <br />of the waste dump for a theoretical 100-year, 24-hour runoff of 140 cfs based on a <br />drainage basin CN of 68. Further, it is my opinion that if the channel is upgraded using <br />Table 1 criteria, and the waste dump fails as a result of a runoff event greater than <br />140 cfs, the downstream impact of such a failure relative to future hydraulic stream <br />flow routing in Windy Gulch would be minimal. As the waste dump is comprised of <br />relatively well angular rock, any "dam" resulting from such a failure would act as a <br />relatively porus rock drain, allowing runoff to flow through the rock, as in the case of <br />a rock drain constructed in a gravity sorted, valley fill waste dump. i do not believe <br />that it would temporarily detain water, fail, then release a "flood wave" downstream. <br />I hope this information is helpful in assisting Homestake with completing the <br />reclamation and closure of the Bulldog Mine. If I can be of further assistance in this <br />matter, please contact me at 1406) 586-9496. <br />Sincerely, <br />v ~'~/ <br />Scott Benowitz, P.E! <br />56/ke <br />BZ:W:\94-072\LETTERSIBULLDOG2.LTR (March 15, 19931 <br />Canonie E nv i ron menta l <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.