Laserfiche WebLink
d I1 <br />•} rA rr O~ ( OtJ rr :..'.p ..:..i~. ~~ • i. .. ._.. III IIIIII III IIII III <br />~ ~ • oe~:.itr~r.vr ar yaroira~ nesoui+c es <br />.~ O. Wnnm Vv ;co e, E.ecutrvc iL r.•cup 999 <br />~~:~? .lll\1?D 1,:1\1) It]!a_:1.:1]1.1'1'11)1 <br />~^ ~•~~ ~, <br />~~~•a^r+ y_,.~,_,.. ~,~^~Y a2aCcntenniai6uildinp.l3t3ShermanSVeet <br />""~~'-~-~~- ~~la ~~~' Oenvar, Cotoraoo 80209 Tcl. (JOJI8(i6-35b7 <br />.-~.•-, <br />David C. Shelton <br />Director <br />NOTICE OF INSPECTION <br />AND <br />INSPECTION REPORT <br />I]A'TE OF TISPECTIQV: July 1, 1982 <br />N.1;1E OF OPERATOR: t?id-Continent Resources, Znc. <br />c/o Mr. George Wear <br />ADDRESS: 201 Centennial St., Suite 406 <br />Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 <br />RE: FILE NO.: 82-121 MIiVE: Mid-Continent <br />Limestone Quarry <br />(Please note the instructions indicated by <br />an X to the right.) <br />Shots Z, 2 6 9, Ro1Z 1 <br />Pre-permit inspection <br />Site shown by George Wear <br />problems noted at time of inupectiu;~ <br />As a reminder, be sure [o file ~rour <br />Annu 1 Report or Vctice of InC~nc o <br />Conti a on the Permit Artniver~a y Datt <br />Possible oblem(s) - 2iotc r co;~enda- <br />tion(s) bel to avoid fur er complica <br />tions or poss' le violat'on(s) at [he <br />time of [he nex insoe ion, <br />Possible violation ) - vote recommend: <br />tion(s) below ar. re y to [he Division. <br />by to avoid <br />enforcement ction. <br />Possible iolation(s) poses an <br />immedi a threat of harm to t <br />envi nment, public welfare, or <br />co inued operation. Enforcement <br />ction forthcoming. <br />OBSERVATIONS OF I`iIPORTANCE: <br />Z. Area is a steep outcrop of limestone at approximately Z:1 variable slope with several <br />intermittent and ephemeral drainages intersecting the site. <br />2. Vegetation is moderate, consisting predominantly of juniper, Gambles oaF:, and ninon <br />pine. <br />REC~:t`E'DIDATIONS : <br />1. See adequacy letter - forthcoming. <br />2. Several mining and reclamation options were discussed and will be addressed in more <br />detail during the adequacy review process for the above application set for the August, 1982 <br />Board rr~etinq. <br />Inspected by <br />rJ/mt <br />J <br />~~ <br />Seclam~tit So cialist <br /> <br />