My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
INSPEC40371
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Inspection
>
INSPEC40371
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:44:36 PM
Creation date
11/18/2007 11:16:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980014
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Date
3/13/2006
Doc Name
Unresolved Problems
From
DMG kap
To
Park County Road and Bridge
Inspection Date
9/15/2005
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
(Page 3) <br />MINE ID k OR PROSPECTING ID #: nn_rcan_ma <br />INSPECTION DATE: ~L1.5/ns <br />INSPECTOR~SINITIALS: KAP <br />The following problems (PB) and/or possible violations (PV) (and suggested corrective actions) were identified <br />during this inspection. The problems should be corrected by the dates given, or they will become possible <br />violations. The possible violations should be corrected by the dates given to reduce iheirseverity when considered <br />by the Mined Land Reclamation Board. The inspector noted on the previous page should be notified of all <br />corrective actions taken. <br />PROBLEMS/POSSIBLE VIOLATIONS <br />AND <br />CORRECTIVE ACTIONS <br />CORRECTION <br />DATE <br />1~ 11/ 15/OS <br />During the inspection, it was discovered that there were no boundary markers identifying <br />the permit boundary at the site. The is a problem related to Section 3.1.12 f2) of the <br />Construction Materials Rules and Regulations for failure to mark the boundaries of the <br />affected area by monuments or other markers Thaf are clearly visible and adequate to <br />delineate such boundaries. <br />PB or PV: ~ <br />TOPIC(S}: Sfld <br />Corrective Aciion~ Place aaaropriaie hot mdaq markers ai th .site within 30 days of receipt - - - <br />nf this incnactinn rP~nrf and cPnrf phntnc to }ha f~ivicinn fnr varifiMtinn <br />2• J2/ ]5/ OS <br />During the inspection it could not be determined whether anv of the stockpiled materiai <br />is topsoil reserved for reclamation. Additionally, if any of the stockpiles are intended as <br />reclamation topsoil, none of the stockpiles possessed a protective veaetative cover. This is <br />a problem related to Rule 3.1.9 (1 ~ of the Construction Materials Rules and Regulations, for <br />failure to remove and seq~gate topsoil from other spoil or of Rule Section 3.1.9 U of the <br />Construction Materials Rules pnd Regulations for failure io emplov vegetative cover or <br />other means to protent topsoil from erosion keep it free of any contamination by toxic or <br />acid-forming material, and maintain it in o useable condition for reclamation. <br />PB or PV: ~B_ <br />TOP4C(S~: ~S._ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.