My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
INSPEC39998
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Inspection
>
INSPEC39998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:44:24 PM
Creation date
11/18/2007 11:14:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977300
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Date
5/13/1981
Doc Name
MINERAL MINE INSPECTIONR REPORT
Inspection Date
5/13/1981
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page -2- • <br />dackfilling and Grading - Rule 6.1 <br />Addits and shafts <br />Final graded slopes-highwall elimination terraces <br />~ Overburden thickness <br />Spoil handling procedures <br />Erosion-rills or gullies/erosion control <br />Toxic, acid forming or combus[ile material handling procedures <br />Grading along contour <br />Slope <br />Stability , <br />Affect on lands outside permit area <br />Handling of drill or auger holes <br />Comments: <br />1. Given the size of the waste rock at the main dump,•is it realistic to expect <br />to obtain a 95% compaction on the clay cap? <br />2. What is the average and maximum % uranium content of the waste rock taken <br />from the ore sorter reject pile that will be stockpiled at the waste dump? <br />3. The temporary waste dump is not shown on the original reclamation map. <br />4. Slopes at the main waste dump are 1:1 or less, road and creek prevent east- <br />ward expansion. <br />5. The temporary dump should be terraced, if possible, to increase slope stabi- <br />lity. <br />6. The earth berm along Ralston Creek is composed of waste rock and cement <br />blocks and appears to be inadequate. <br />7. The small earth moving operation on the north side should be described in <br />detail. <br />Protection of Hydrologic System Rule 6.2 <br />Dams <br />[dater leaving affected area <br />Surface caater monitoring <br />Diversions temporary/permanent <br />Stream channel diversions <br />Sediment Control/Maintenance of Ponds <br />Discharge structures <br />Acid or toxic materials <br />Ground caater monitoring <br />Permanent impounds <br />Haul 5 access road drainage <br />Grade <br />Drainage Ditches <br />Culverts erosion control <br />Other transport facilities <br />Other agencies or permits <br />Prasence of leachate <br />Comments: <br />1. During periods of wet weather, free standing water on the situ should be <br />collected and placed into the settling pond system. <br />2. Haul and access road drainage is poor along Ralston Creek, the berm should <br />be improved and the drainage collected. <br />3. The ore storage and loading area should be cement lined in such a way that <br />all of the ore and drainage remains on the pad. <br />4. Why wait to construct the water diversion ditch above the main waste dump? <br />5. The proposed earthen berm or ditch to handle drainage from thE~ watershed <br />Iildlife Rule 6.3 adjacent to tl:e water treat- <br />ment building has not been <br />Safety S Protection built as per 1.`igure D-3. <br />Critical species observed 6. Has any radium been found in <br />Ivey species to [dhich habitat restoration is aimed earthen pond ~F3 H2O? If so, <br />Comments: how much? How does this compare <br />to the various: other ponds and <br />1. The operator needs to describe all wildlife water enterin}; the treatment <br />use of the area, expecially use of the plant? How m~ich radium from <br />settling ponds. this operation is entering <br />Ralston Creek" <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.