Laserfiche WebLink
(Page 2) <br />MINE ID # OR PROSPECTING ID # M-1991-079 <br />INSPECTION DATE 6-30-2005 <br />OBSERVATIONS <br />INSPECTOR'S INITIALS SSS <br />This was a routine monitoring inspection conducted as part of DMG's ongoing monitoring program for permitted mines in <br />Colorado. <br />The mine identification sign and affected area boundary markers are in place and in compliance with Rule 3.1.12. The <br />Coordinates of the site entrance were recorded with the Trimble GPS. 39°01'49"N, 108°33'41"W, 4600' elevation MSL. <br />This pit is currently approximately 15 feet deep with water that flowed in during flooding of the adjacent Colorado River in late <br />May 2005. The pit was maintained in a dewatered condition prior to that event. The force of the river entering and dropping <br />into the pit resulted in three erosional features on the south side of the pit. The erosional channels vary 3-12 and similar in <br />width. The center channel extends beyond the property line onto BLM controlled surface area that lies between the river and <br />the mine. This channel is located on a highpoint between the two other channels that are located in swales. The location of the <br />middle channel supports Mr. Lyman's stated observations that waterwas piping underneath the surface from the BLM land to <br />the pit, eventually collapsing and creating this channel. During this inspection, the inspector noted two locations where small <br />sink holes had formed and may have been the initiation of more piping features. All sediment from erosion of these channels <br />was captured in the pit. the only off-site damage noted is the portion of the middle channel that extends into the BLM property. <br />Because it cannot be demonstrated that the erosion progressed from the pit to the BLM property, but may have resulted from <br />piping, this is not considered to be an enforcement situation. <br />These erosion channels are noted as a problem and will need to be repaired. DMG will leave it up to the permittee as to how <br />the channels are to be repaired. It appears that they can either be filled in completely, or possibly it would be more beneficial to <br />grade and stabilize these channels so they function as controlled inlets to the pit for future flooding events. The drop from the <br />pit wall crest to the expected water level after completion of reclamation is not expected to be significant enough to cause major <br />erosion to the post mine reclamation, but during mining, a controlled flow into the pit during flooding maybe advisable. In any <br />case, a technical revision to the permit will need to be submitted that addresses howthe erosion channels will be repaired. The <br />revision will need to include specifications for compaction of fill, grading and surface stabilization. Elam will need to contact the <br />BLM regarding handling and coordination of erosion channel repairs on their property. The revision will need to be submitted by <br />August 31, 2005 and receive DMG approval within statutory timeframes. <br />During flooding, Elam was able to remove the fuel tank from the pit and place it in a temporary bermed area near the scales. <br />They will use this opportunity to replace the spill containment liner with a liner more suited to this use as determined during a <br />spill event at another of Elam's operations. The old liner was very badly degraded and virtually ineffective. Elam should not <br />delay replacing any spill containment liners at their other operations, especially if the tanks are located this close to <br />groundwater and the liners are compromised. <br />The site weed control plan appears to be keeping noxious weeds from infesting the site. There are several locations with <br />knapweed encroaching into the permit area that Elam reportedlytreats each year. The majority of tamarisk and Russian olive <br />encroaching on the site appear to be in the areas where mining and reclamation were completed prior to January 19, 2005. <br />Elam will need to implement their recently approved tamarisk and Russian olive management plan for the remainder of the <br />affected areas of the site. Management on the reclaimed areas is also strongly encouraged, but not mandatory. <br />This inspection was scheduled, in part, to collect information on current site conditions for use in updating the reclamation cost <br />estimate to ensure the state holds adequate bond to reclaim the site. With the pit currently filled with water, this task has been <br />delayed. Elam is asked to notify DMG upon completion of pit dewatering so an additional inspection can be done to collect this <br />information. <br />Much of the overburden pile was used to build a berm along the buffer area between the pit and the river as well as across the <br />pit floor on the facilities level. Elam will need to contact the Army Corps of Engineers regarding these dikes, to determine if they <br />can remain as permanent features, or if they need to be permitted or removed. Elam will need to notify DMG of the results of <br />these conversations and take any permitting actions necessary to keep the reclamation permit accurate and up to date. <br />Topsoil piles along the haul road on the north side of the pit/facilities area appear to need shaping and stabilization, preferably <br />by grading to slopes less than 3H:1 V and seeding with the approved seed mix. This work should be completed so that seeding <br />can take place in September. <br />