My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
INSPEC38776
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Inspection
>
INSPEC38776
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:43:43 PM
Creation date
11/18/2007 11:07:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Date
11/24/2003
Doc Name
OSM Inspection Report
From
OSM
To
DMG
Inspection Date
6/4/2003
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
...~ <br />relocated prior to finalizing the release, and will also <br />subsequently be checked for extent of disturbance. <br />A minor map problem was discovered just WSW of tank JW-14. <br />The release area was drawn to include a small section of the <br />haul road into the ash pit. This area will be deleted from the <br />release request. <br />A small topsoil pile is located S of tank JW-11 that will <br />be used in reclaiming the haul road. It is excluded from the <br />release area, but no access route to the pile has been excluded. <br />We agreed that the narrow area between the road and the pile <br />will have to be redisturbed in reclaiming the road, so this <br />narrow area will also be removed from the release request, which <br />will also allow access to the pile. <br />Two other topsoil piles still exist in the SE corner of <br />this release area. They, too, have been excluded from the <br />release area, but no access route to them has been excluded. <br />Janet Binns will check whether these piles are needed for road <br />reclamation and, if so, discuss with her supervisors how to <br />handle access to them. The piles may have been intended-for <br />reclamation of ponds that have subsequently been approved to <br />remain as permanent structures. We discussed whether, if that <br />is the case, they need to be moved elsewhere, graded out in <br />place, or simply left as is. They are obviously piles, not <br />natural features, but they do present some valuable <br />topographical diversity. They were apparently not planted with <br />the rangeland seed mix, for they have no shrub establishment. <br />But they do have 8-10 years of good, dense grass growth; grading <br />them out would eliminate those years of good productivity and <br />might create weed problems. Janet Binns will investigate this <br />matter with the mine before a final decision on this bond <br />release request is made. <br />About 400 feet SE of tank JE-6, we observed what appeared <br />to be the remains of an old topsoil pile. One topsoil marker <br />was noted at the SW corner of the pile. Janet Binns will check <br />with the mine, and old inspection reports, to see when this pile <br />was used. It is probable that the pile was considered to have <br />been totally used, but no one remembered to remove the topsoil <br />marker. The revegetation on the pile remnant is weedier than <br />the rest of the area, but is successfully controlling erosion. <br />The following morning <br />stopped at the Crain BLM o <br />inspection with Rob Ernst. <br />three power lines, and the <br />remnant pile, will have to <br />subsequent inspection. <br />(June 5), on my way out of town, I <br />Efice and briefly discussed the <br />I told him that the issues of the <br />two "island" topsoil piles, and one <br />be addressed by Janet Binns on a <br />~~Y <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.