Laserfiche WebLink
<br />United States Department of the Interior <br />OFFICE OF SURFACE MINING <br />Reclamation and Enforcement <br />Suite 1200 <br />505 Marquette Avenue N.W. <br />Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102 <br />III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII <br />. ,,.~~ <br />11h1E== <br />~~~ <br />•~ ~ <br />~ - ^ <br />w arrt,vnrme m <br />RECEi`iEa <br />aPR 12 1993 <br />April 9, 1993 <br />Divis~en ci iamea~. i:. ,:cu:,;_: <br />Permit: C-80-006 <br />Mine Name: Marr Strip <br />Mr. Steve Renner, Coal Program Supervisor <br />Division of Minerals and Geology <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />215 Centennial 9uilding <br />1313 Sherman Street <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />Dear a:r. xenner. <br />The enclosed Office of Surface Mining Reclamatior. and E.^.~orcement (OSMj <br />inspection report identifies violations that are considered to have <br />existed at the time of the last State complete inspection (LSCI) but had <br />not been cited. <br />Dace of Federal Inspection: 4/1/93 Date of LSCI: 12/16/92 <br />The determination that the State did not cite the violations is based on <br />one or sore of the following reasons: <br />The condition was identified in a State inspection repent but no <br />State enforcement action was taken. <br />Design criteria or requirea certification has not bee: -et =-- <br />structure in existence as of the last State complete inspection <br />(sediment pond, excess spoil fill, etc.). <br />:{ Necessary controls that were regi}ired at the time of the last <br />State ccmolete inspection have not beer, establ'_shed (diversion <br />ditches, sediment ponds, top soil protection, signs and markers, <br />etc.). (LOadout -~ sign and perimeter .:arkers) <br />X Site conditions indicate that the vi.o.lation(s) noted had been in <br />existence at the time of, or prior to, the last State complete <br />inspection. (Unapproved cul:2rt installations; _cad desig^) <br />Other (give explanation). <br />Although the violations were c'_ted by -:e State, or were abated during a <br />joint inspection, GSM believes that the violations were evident during <br />the last State complete inspection. <br />