INSPEC38711 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

', Inspection Report • November 70, 1980 Page Four topsoil could not occur should be identified. i Areas which could not receive adequate topsoil 4. Chiselling or ripping of compacted areas prior to topsoil application should be considered. All compacted areas should be'identified. 5. Disposition and possible removal of concrete rubble and forms occurring within the permit area should be addressed. A plan of reclamation for such areas should be developed. 6. Portions of existing ponds should be altered and reshaped by stragic removal of pond dividers to create islands and peninsulas, and replace- ment of excess material along [he straighter portions of pond shorelines, in order to create a more irregular appearance. The creation of more naturally appearing ponds would be more consistant with the permit and would enhance aquatic and terrestrial wildlife. 7. A plan should be developed for mitigating shoreline erosion and mass instability of the north and east shorelines and banks of the southern most pond. . 8. The water quality of the ponds should be evaluated to determine whether or not adverse conditions, which threaten continued beneficial use of the ponds, are present and/or developing. If adverse conditions have developed, the influence on continued recreational uses of the ponds should be addressed. 9. The operator should consult with the Soil Conservation Service to analyze existing on-site revegetation problems and, as a result, develop a revised and complete revegetation program. 10. Present costs for mitigation and reclamation of existing conditions should be calculated. In addition, the present acreage of affected land remaining above water should be determined.