INSPEC38674 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

(Page 2) MINE ID # OR PROSPECTING ID # M-1986-076 INSPECTION DATE 7/19/02 INSPECTOR'S INITIALS RCO OBSERVATIONS This inspection was performed by the Division as part of its monitoring of Hard Rock and Metals i 10 DMO permits. The operator could not be contacted by phone, so he was mailed a letter about the upcoming scheduled inspection. Though there was obvious recent activity at the site, there was no activity and no mining personnel at the site during the inspection. While this inspector was driving back down the access road after concluding the inspection, he was met by 2 men who stated that they were the new operators and lessees of the site las named below, and designated to receive copy of reportl. Until such time as the new lessees have the permit transferred over to them, or become the new designated contact persons under the same permit-holder (i.e., Deadwood Gulch Mining Co., or DGMCI, this office will continue to consider Mr. Bob Hill as the permit contact and DGMC as the entity responsible for maintaining the permit, submitting the required reports and annual fees, and posting the bond. If documents are needed to transfer the permit to this new party, please contact this office and request such. If the permit is to continue to be issued to DGMC but the contact persons are different, a written statement showing the new names, phones and addresses must be submitted. The site exhibited several permit ID and boundary signs, all of which were modified to show the new party's name and contact address. The boundary signs were not all posted exactly at permit boundary corners, but were often in locations where a vehicle road crossed a boundary. This is satisfactory, as long as the operator ensures that all site development on the ridge occurs within the permit boundaries, and the boundary locations are well known. Additional signs may have to be posted as development occurs. Rain had fallen the night before this inspection, which allowed this inspector to observe the effectiveness of grading onsite to control stormwater, It is absolutely essential that the designed structures and surface grading which were approved for the permit be maintained to function as designed with adequate capacity. The ramp roads onsite do not always exhibit adequate grading to control erosion, often lacking waterbars and diversions, or a surface graded to direct the water to the inside edge. Some of the operating pads are to include collection sumps or berms, though these were not always onserved. In places less stable runoff paths were observed, which can cause onsite (or offsitel deterioration from gully erosion or sedimentation. This is not a problem at this time, but attention should be given to installing and maintaining all required items. The mill building waS shut and locked, as was the cabin-shed on the mill pad. Much debris and parts formerly noted as stored outside the mill and shed have been removed or more neatly stored. The hopper and conveyor are still set up behind the mill, with ore in the hopper and tarp over the hopper. The approved designated chemicals have been placed securely inside the locked building. The mill building also houses the diesel generator. The diesel storage tank is still outside, out of the way of most mine traffic, but with no secondary containment. No spillage is noted, and this is not a problem at this time, but the operator should consider providing secondary containment. Water tanks for supplying the mill circuit are outside the back of the mill. The tails from the mill circuit ends in a sump outside the mill building, where it consists of solids and liquid, having been neutralized immediately prior to it placement in the sump. The sump was nearly full to capacity at the time of the inspection, with only about 6 inches of freeboard left. The sump was designed to allow percolation of the liquid into the permeable hillside colluvium, but only if the ground actually accepted percolation. Rains the preceding night may have begun to saturate the ground, which would slow the rate of percolation. However, the sump is placed such that it also receives stormwater from areas uphill which, given the recent rain, probably also contributed to filling the sump. The operator must not let the sump become too full; more regular emptying of tails is essential to ensuring adequate capacity and containment. (It should be noted that the tailings sands are physically transported downhill by loader for final disposal. Sands have been observed on the road downhill from the mill building, probably indicating less-than-perfect haulage, but possibly indicating inadequate containment in the sump. This must be maintained and monitored as long as it is part of the approved plan.) The former location of the tailings disposal is now the location of the ore crusher, which has been moved from its former location farther down the hill. There are other items on the same road and pad area, including conveyor parts, agitation tanks, mist steel stock, timbers and wood debris, and small power equipment. The fuel storage for this equipment amounts to less than 40 gallons. Storage is less than adequate, there being no secondary containment, but also exhibiting soil staining from spilled diesel. It appears to be a small amount, which will allow onsite "disposal" through dispersal and