Laserfiche WebLink
III. COMMENTS -COMPLIANCE <br />Below are comments on the Inspecflon. The comments include discussion of observations <br />made dunng the inspeci~on. Comments in Section IV describe any enforcement actions <br />taken during the inspection and the facts or evidence supporting the enforcement ocHon. <br />Items of concern from earlier inspections include: The permit boundary sign where <br />Pitkin County Road 1 enters the permit area from the west was improperly located. <br />The permit boundary sign where US Forest Service Road 306 enters the permit area <br />from the east was missing. <br />Sians and Markers The permit boundary sign where Pitkin County Road 1 enters the <br />permit area from the west was in its proper place. The permit boundary sign where US <br />Forest Service Road 306 enters the permit area from the east was in place. <br />West entrance, Pitkin County Road <br />306 <br />Hydrologic Balance Field measurements for pH and Total Dissolved Solids tTDS) were <br />taken at a number of locations. <br />There were mine water discharges from <br />the outlet pipes at the head of the <br />baffle half-pipe of Treatment Pond 1 <br />from both Portal 1 and Portal 3. Portal 3 <br />flow was measured as 1 cup per 2 <br />seconds (1.9 gallon per minute or 0.004 <br />cubic feet per second). The pH of Portal <br />3 discharge was 8.5 and TDS was 810 <br />mg/I. This discharge had a red tint to lt, <br />Discharges from Portal 1 were clear, with <br />a pH of 8.0 and TDS of 1090 mg/I. <br />. - 'r.y•I' '~ <br />;:~ <br />~` <br />~~,I•~ <br />•~.: ~,' <br />-;: . . <br />~. ,. - ,;, <br />1- .•~. .. ... <br />C-81.025, Page _3_ of _8_ Pages, (date) _27 May 03 (initials) _BGY~ <br />All other signs and markers were in place. <br />