My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
INSPEC37401
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Inspection
>
INSPEC37401
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:42:56 PM
Creation date
11/18/2007 11:01:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1982020
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Date
10/31/2006
Doc Name
Inspection report
From
DRMS
To
Melvin R. Gydesen
Inspection Date
9/7/2006
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
(Page 2) <br />MINE ID # OR PROSPECTING ID # M-1982-020 <br />INSPECTION DATE 9-7-2006 <br />OBSERVATIONS <br />INSPECTOR'S INITIALS SSS <br />The steel locking door on the secondary escapeway does not appear substantial enough as a post-mine closure, to prevent <br />unauthorized entry. The permittee will need to either strengthen the door, possiblywith some locking cross bars, or indicate that <br />the reclamation bond can be increased to add these safeguards during reclamation. Documentation of reinforcement of the <br />door must be submitted by 12-15-2006, or the reclamation bond will be increased to account for installation of the door <br />reinforcement. <br />The mine identification sign was not observed and must be installed per the requirements of Rule 3.1.12 (1) that state: The <br />operator shall post a sign at the entrance to the mine site which shall be clearly visible from the access road and specify the <br />following; a) the name of the operator; b) indicate that a reclamation permit for the operation has been issued by the <br />Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Board, and; c) the permit number. The lack of an identification sign is noted as a problem <br />with the corrective action(s) and correction date specified on the last page of this report. <br />The above ground diesel fuel tank, located beside the engine building is now located within a spill containment berm. The spill <br />containment does not appear to be adequately sized to contain all the fluid of the tank, in the event of a spill. The permittee will <br />need to ensure that this tank and all hazardous material containers stored on site are located in adequate spill containment <br />facilities. This includes drums and buckets of hazardous materials, batteries, etc. Documentation of adequate sizing of the spill <br />containment berm must be submitted to DRMS by 12-15-2006. <br />Explosives magazines were not noted during this inspection. <br />No significant erosional features were noted on the affected areas of the site. <br />The permittee indicated that they are currently importing ore from another mine site, processing it at this mill, and discharging <br />the tailing to the lower tailings pond, risking the potential to make this a custom mill and possibly a Designated Mining <br />Operation, DRMS understands that ownership of the Mill is now held by an entity other than the permittee. If ownership of the <br />Lucky Strike mill and the mine from which the ore originates is held by the same entity, then the custom mill designation does <br />not apply. However, DRMS recommends chat a Succession of Operator for the Lucky Strike be submitted to clarify the link <br />between the mill and the mine from which the ore is being imported. At a minimum, documentation of common ownership of <br />the Lucky Strike Mill and the mine from which the ore is being imported needs to be submitted. In absence of this <br />documentation, the site may be considered to be a custom mill and procedures initiated to transferjurisdiction to the Colorado <br />Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE). <br />A memorandum of understanding between DRMS and the CDPHE and the law both say: (A) counties decide whether a facility <br />can become a custom mill, and (B) CDPHE oversees the certificates of designation (as a custom mill). In the case of mining, <br />where certificates of designation show the ores to be ordinary ores -not uranium ores and not mine wastes being re-processed <br />that might contain foreign chemicals -they sometimes have deferred to DRMS for mills that are part of aDRMS-permitted <br />operation. <br />County Custom Mill Designation is a feature of local land use regulations or zoning. It secures land use decisions in the <br />hands of the counties, and allows the county to impose local regulations on issues like noise, traffic, hours of operation, <br />aesthetics, etc. In other words: the state, through certificates of designation and reclamation permits cannot impose a <br />custom mill upon a county if the county doesn't want it. <br />In 2004, the permittee committed to notifying DRMS prior to importing any ore for processing at this mill. This notification <br />did not occur. Therefore, before any additional ore from an off-site mine is imported or processed, and by no later than the <br />correction date noted, the permittee must submit documentation demonstrating that the Lucky Strike Mill does not meet <br />the definition of a custom mill, or: <br />1. Gain county approval for a custom mill; <br />2. Contact CDPHE -Solid Waste Disposal Section -Glenn Mallory- regarding the need for getting a certificate of <br />designation for the ores identified for importation and processing. <br />3. If CDPHE decides to test the ore and provide a certificate of designation, they have that authority. However, they <br />cannot cause ores to be deposited onto a DRMS permitted site without a proper bond covering disposition and reclamation <br />related to disposal of the mill waste related to that designated material. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.