My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
INSPEC36889
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Inspection
>
INSPEC36889
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:42:41 PM
Creation date
11/18/2007 10:58:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980004
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Name
Inspection Report
Inspection Date
4/14/2005
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
III. COMMENTS -COMPLIANCE <br />Below are comments on the inspection. The comments include discussion of observations made <br />during the inspection. Comments also describe any enforcement actions taken during the inspection <br />and the facts or evidence supporting the enforcement action. <br />General Comments <br />This was a partial mine site inspection, conducted by Dan Mathews of the Grand Junction Field Office. <br />was accompanied during the inspection (with the exception of the inspection of the lower McClane Creek <br />temporary diversion segment) by Walter Whitledge of CAM. Weather was clear and warm; ground <br />conditions had dried significantly since the previous inspection. The mine was actively producing coal at <br />the time of the inspection; Mr. Whitledge indicated that ventilation plan modifications had been <br />implemented to address the hydrogen sulfide problem noted in the March inspection report. <br />Roads <br />Some road maintenance had been completed since the previous inspection, but some maintenance work <br />remains to be done. . , <br />Minor rock and sediment accumulation along a segment of inside road ditch~atthe base of the steep <br />cut-slope, approximately 100 yards up the road from the steel gate (between the portal. area and the <br />sediment pond/soil stockpile areal. <br />The in-ditch sediment trap across from the equipment storage area was partially cleaned out, further <br />clean-out is warranted later this spring/summer, as the material dries out. <br />A large juniper limb had fallen into the ditch just below the sediment trap, and needs to be removed. <br />1 Anew culvert needs to be installed in the outside road ditch in accordance-with the recent minor <br />revision, approval, to allow occasional access for the power company to read the meter on the power <br />pole. This culvert had recently been delivered, but was not yet installed. <br />Hydrologic Balance <br />There was turbid flow in East Salt Creek, no flow in McClane Creek,, at the time of the inspection. <br />The rock fall that had impacted Culvert "F", on the cut slope above the shop building, had not yet been <br />addressed. Ground conditions in this location have dried since the previous inspection, and it appears <br />that the work to remove the rock and repair the culvert can be done soon, if the warm dry weather <br />continues. When ground conditions allow for safely completing the task, the rock will need to be pulled <br />off the slope and the culvert will need to be replaced or repaired as necessary. <br />The reconstructed sediment pond embankment appeared to be stable, with no evidence of cracking, <br />slumping, or seepage. Some germination of seeded grasses was noted on the embankment. <br />Water level in the sediment pond was approximately 6 inches below the primary spillway inlet. The inlet <br />valve was closed, and the pond was not discharging. <br />SAE silt fence structures at the topsoil stockpile, construction dirt stockpile, and office area were intact <br />and functional. <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.