My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
INSPEC35958
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Inspection
>
INSPEC35958
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:38:03 PM
Creation date
11/18/2007 10:53:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1981121
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Name
MINERALS PROGRAM INSPECTION REPORT
Inspection Date
1/24/2001
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
'~ <br /> <br />WHITE -PUBLIC FILE <br />YELLOW-OPERATOR <br />(Page 2) <br />MINE ID # OR PROSPECTING ID #: M-1 QR1-I71 <br />INSPECTION DATE: t-7a-m <br /> <br />PINK -CORRESPONDENCE FILE <br />INSPECT-OR'S INITIALS: ~I~ <br />The Division conducted a monitoring inspection of the site as part of the year 2000/2001 fiscal year sites to <br />be inspected. The site is a small ilOC materials permit with 9.9 acres of total permitted acreage and with a <br />maximum disturbance of 1.5 acres. Even though, in the annual report the permit acreage is reported as <br />17.8 acres in error, the actual permit acreage is indeed 9.9 acres. Operator was notified of the pending site <br />inspection but was unable to attend. The financial warranty for the expected disturbance was calculated in <br />1993 and it appears given the present affected acreage to be adequate. The site was not active at the time <br />of the inspection, however, the presence of a small front end loader in the pit floor and fresh disturbance <br />indicates, the site has been active recently. According to the annual report and what was observed on site, <br />the operator appears to have conducted some slope reclamation along the south side. Initial cursory survey <br />of the affected area was considered to be more than what was approved in the reclamation plan. On 2-Ol <br />01, an accurate survey of the site was conducted and found it to be as approved. However, the operator has <br />to be very careful along the East Side of the permit as to not affect outside of the approved acreage. High <br />walls were stable; no major erosion features were noted. Permit sign and boundary markers were properly <br />displayed. <br />I & E Contact Address <br />NAME: BILLY HALE/ BONNIE SOLBERG <br />OPERATOR: SAME AS ABOVE <br />STREET: 7595 CAITFORNIA DRTVE <br />CITYJSTATEJZIP: C'O ORADO SPRTNG$, ('OI ORADO 80977 <br />JAMES STEVENS <br />cc: ^ CE <br />^ BL <br />^ FS <br />^ HW <br />^ HMWMD (CH) <br />^ SE <br />^ WQCD (CH) <br />^ OTHER <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.