Laserfiche WebLink
.~ <br />s <br />May 27, 2004 <br />Twin Pines Mine <br />Bond forfeiture site administered by the <br />Colorado Division of Minerals and Geology (DMG) <br />Revoked Permit No. C-83-058 <br />EY 04 Special Focus Evaluation <br />May 25, 2004, field evaluation on site <br />Participants: <br />Tim Stark, DMG <br />Kent Gorham, DMG <br />Henry Austin, Office of Surface Mining (OSM) <br />The participants evaluated the Twin Pines (TP) bond forfeiture site for off site impacts as <br />outlined in the DMG / OSM EY 2004 Performance Agreement. This same off site <br />impacts analysis of Colorado DMG's 13-14 bond forfeiture /permit revocation sites was <br />conducted by the joint DMG / OSM Oversight Team during Evaluation Year 2000 (EY <br />2000). Weather conditions were overcast and windy, ground conditions were very dry on <br />all areas inspected. <br />Prior to the inspection we reviewed documents including the following: <br />EY 1999 Colorado Bond Forfeiture Sites, a DMG listing of all bond forfeiture sites, their <br />respective histories, and current disposition; the OSM December 2000 Annual Evaluation <br />Summary Report, that documents the findings of the EY 2000 special focus evaluations <br />of these same bond forfeiture sites; and the EY 2004 Performance Agreement write up <br />describing the off site impact analysis /evaluation to be conducted over the next two <br />evaluation years (to end June 30, 2005) on Colorado's 14 bond forfeiture / or permit <br />revocation sites (13 bond forfeitures & 1 permit revocation w/o bond forfeiture-a bank <br />completed the reclamation at that permit revocation site). <br />The EY 2000 evaluation findings for this topic listed 3 minor off site impacts, primarily <br />from sediment leaving the permit area, from 3 of the 14 bond forfeiture sites in Colorado. <br />There are no perennial streams receiving direct flow from the disturbed areas at TP. <br />Reclamation at the TP site was completed by the permittee in 1995 prior to bond <br />forfeiture of $22, 600.00 in 1996. This EY 2004 evaluation also finds the site in <br />essentially the same condition as in EY 2000. The site is stable, well vegetated, and not <br />contributine to any off site impacts. <br />