Laserfiche WebLink
<br />• (Page 2l • <br />MINE ID rX OR PROSPECTING ID rY M-2000-110 <br />INSPECTION DATE 10131/00 INSPECTOR'S INITIALS RCO <br />OBSERVATIONS <br />This pre-operation inspection was performed by the Division during the review period for this new 112 Construction <br />Materials permit application. The operator's representative was contacted about the inspection and a time was arranged <br />for a joint inspection of the site. The persons named on page one were present throughout the inspection. <br />The Notice required to be posted under Rule 1.6 was observed on the right-of-way fence at the location of the proposed <br />haul road entrance gate. The proposed haul road does not currently exist; the site was accessed during the inspection <br />via the existing farmstead road, which will not be used as part of the permitted operation. The farmstead road is private, <br />and no part of it is located within a county road right-of-way. <br />The area of proposed excavation was inspected first. Stakes have been placed marking the corners of the proposed permit <br />boundary, which are set back from the fencelines by 50 to 200 feet. The site is fairly level, though slight variations in the <br />topography are evident by drainage patterns and ditches. There are "flowing wells" (small artesian wells) on the site, <br />though mining-related disturbance to them will be avoided. One of these wells, in particular, lying within the excavation <br />area, was also the location of an overhead powerline supplying power to an electric pump for livestock water. These <br />features are privately-owned by the applicant, will not be disturbed by mining, and will remain after reclamation. <br />The site is presently pasture, with differing depths of topsoil observed, ranging from thin and gravelly to over one foot deep <br />and free of aggregate. The excavation area contains no cross fences to remove. There was one circle pivot irrigation <br />system on the site, though it is not used, and will be removed prior to excavation. <br />The fences surrounding the excavation area are well outside the proposed permit area boundary, and even farther away <br />from the affected area boundary, except for a couple locations. The northern truck access road will enter the site through <br />the right-of-way fence, where a gate will be constructed (though the county has apparently stated that the access fill <br />and/or paved apron will not require a culvert therel. The area between the excavation area and the proposed stockpile and <br />rail spur area is crossed by the landowner's fence, which will remain, though a new gate for pit traffic lat an exact location <br />not yet determined) will be constructed. This hauling corridor will cross the vicinity of the utility-owned overhead electric <br />powerlines, overhead telephone line, buried natural gas pipeline, as well as an earthen ditch and dirt road owned by the <br />applicant. The applicant must secure damage agreements from all outside parties having an interest in these structures. <br />All pertinent details required of the applicant by these parties, regarding setback distances, fill depths or grades, etc., will <br />become part of the permit plans, and will be monitored by the Division. Please ensure that these are adequately <br />communicated to this office. The applicant's earthen ditch and dirt road (which provides access to a residence outside <br />the southern boundary of the permit areal are presumed to remain throughout the life of the mine. <br />Fish Ditch, an earthen ditch crossing the southern half of the excavation area, is owned by the applicant. It will not be <br />disturbed by mining, since it is required for conveying water to other lands downstream (to the southeastl, now and in the <br />future. Limits of mining on either side will be set back by a defined buffer distance. <br />The eastern area of the permit, described as the stockpile and rail spur area, was observed last. It also is fairly level but <br />with slightly varying terrain. Ditches and ephemeral drainages cross the area, though mostly grassy, there were numerous <br />stands of woody vegetation (mature cottonwoods and willow thicketsl. Dryer portions of the site exhibited rangeland <br />grasses and rabbitbrush. The affected area of this portion should be confined to these dryer upland areas, and avoid the <br />drainageways. <br />The existing rail line adjoins the eastern end of the permit area. The junction for proposed rail spur which will allow rail <br />access to the stockpile area will be in the southwest corner of the permit area. The existing line is elevated several feet <br />above the existing grade of the applicant's land, and will require (at least at that eastern endl sufficient fill to meet that <br />grade, as well as adequate drainage control (i.e., culvertsl. It is not clear at this time what other structures will be installed <br />in this area besides the rail spur, such as loadouts, pads, ramps, road fills, etc. <br />The inspection meeting ended with a discussion of the details of the application and the questions in the Division's <br />adequacy review letter. The operator or his agent will clarify and answer all outstanding issues in the responses. <br />