My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
INSPEC34776
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Inspection
>
INSPEC34776
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:37:02 PM
Creation date
11/18/2007 10:48:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981015
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Name
Inspection Report
Inspection Date
5/17/2005
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
III. COMMENTS -COMPLIANCE <br />Below are comments on the inspection. The comments include discussion of observations made <br />during the inspection. Comments also describe any enforcement actions taken during the inspection <br />and the facts or evidence supporting the enforcement action. <br />This was a complete quarterly inspection of the Fruita mine site conducted by Dan Mathews <br />and Janet Binns of DMG. In addition to the quarterly inspection, vegetation cover sampling <br />was conducted to provide data in support of Phase II bond release and sediment pond <br />removal demonstrations. The Fruita Mine reclamation plan did not specify removal of the <br />pond embankment, and the Division does not contemplate such removal. However, initial <br />assessment based on vegetation cover data and site conditions indicate that the sediment <br />pond is no longer necessary to control disturbed area sedimentation. If this initial <br />assessment is confirmed, the Division will propose to discontinue monitoring and <br />maintenance of the sediment pond embankment and spillway structures. <br />Site conditions were largely unchanged from those described in the March 2005 and <br />December 2004 inspections. The only change of note is the seasonal growth of vegetation, <br />which is particularly lush this year, <br />Revegetation/Reclamation Success <br />Perennial grasses and shrubs have exhibited impressive growth due to the above normal <br />fall/winter/spring precipitation. Rubber rabbitbrush and shadscale saltbush in particular were <br />notable for the amount of annual growth produced, with longer leaves and stem leaders <br />than normal. In addition to the vigorous appearance of the shrubs that were seeded in <br />2000 and previously, high numbers of seedling four-wing and shadscale saltbush, and <br />rubber rabbitbrush were noted in various locations throughout the reclaimed area. There <br />has also been a flush of annual vegetation, with significantly higher densities of annual <br />grasses, particularly cheatgrass brome and little barley, along with annual fortis including <br />tumble mustard, flixweed, blue mustard, storksbill, various buckwheats, and others. The <br />flush of annual vegetation is not limited to the disturbed mine areas, but is apparent all <br />along the base of the bookcliffs and the semi-desert lowlands to the south of the bookcliffs, <br />in western Colorado and eastern Utah. <br />Thirty randomly located, 10 meter vegetation cover transacts were run. At each transact, a <br />tri-pod mounted ocular 10 point frame was set up every 2 meters, for a total of 50 readings <br />per transact. A complete vegetation assessment report has not been prepared, however an <br />initial cover summary has been prepared, and is attached. <br />Tha sole vegetation standard applicable to the Fruita Mine is vegetation cover (because of <br />the extensive pre-law disturbance at the site). The mine was never permitted under the <br />permanent regulatory program, but the Division had proposed a cover standard of 25% in a <br />findings document that was prepared prior to forfeiture of the reclamation bond. Based on <br />the data collected, the standard was easily exceeded this, year. The applicable criteria is <br />22.5% vegetation cover (90% of the approved standard). The sample mean from the cover <br />data collected by the Division was 43.2%, based on the sample size of 30 transacts. <br />Statistical sample adequacy was not met (30 transacts run vs. 31 calculated for adequacy), <br />however a statistically valid "reverse null" demonstration of success was made. The 90% <br />lower confidence limit on the mean is 38.83°k, which easily exceeds the standard. This <br />result is confirmed by the reverse null t-test, in which the calculated t value of 7.66 <br />exceeds the table t value of 1.311. Because the calculated t value exceeds the table t <br />value, the null hypothesis of equality is rejected, and success is demonstrated. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.