Laserfiche WebLink
<br />III. COMMENTS -COMPLIANCE <br />Below are comments on the inspection. The comments include discussion of observations made <br />during the inspection. Comments also describe any enforcement actions taken during the <br />inspection and the facts or evidence supporting the enforcement action. <br />This was an aerial inspection flown on December 9, 1999. There were no problems noted during <br />the overflight. The digital images were inspected on December 21, 1999. There were three <br />images taken of mining related sites; Lower Hubbazd Creek, Upper Hubbazd Creek and Beaz <br />Creek. <br />Lower Hubbazd Creek <br />The Hubbard Creek road was snow covered in places. The road appeazed to be passable. The <br />reclaimed azea on the west side of Hubbazd. Creek was snow covered, including the access road <br />leading to the site. The reclaimed azea on the east side of Hubbazd Creek was cleaz of snow, <br />except the access road had some snow on it. There was no evidence of any gullying or slope <br />instability on the reclaimed azeas. The rocks sepazating the pazking area from the reclaimed area <br />were still in place. There was no activity on site. <br />Upper Hubbazd Creek <br />Most of the Upper Hubbazd Creek bench was cleaz of snow. The bench outslope was snow <br />covered. The road leading to the bench was cleaz of snow. The two track leading from the bench <br />to the topsoil stockpile had some snow on a portion of it. There was a little snow on a portion of <br />the topsoil pile. The pond appeazed to be dry. There was no evidence of erosional gullying or <br />slope instability on the mining azeas. There was no evidence of activity at the site. <br />Beaz Creek <br />There was almost no snow cover on the reclaimed azea and on the access road. There was no <br />evidence of slope instability or erosional gullying on the reclaimed azeas. There was no activity <br />on site. <br />c:\ms97\sanbom\i nsp 1299 <br />