My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
INSPEC33531
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Inspection
>
INSPEC33531
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:35:57 PM
Creation date
11/18/2007 10:42:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1991133
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Name
Inspection Report
From
DMG
To
Valle Escondido
Inspection Date
10/15/2002
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
IPage;21 <br />MINE ID # OR PROSPECTING ID # M-1991-133 <br />INSPECTION DATE 10/15/02 ' '~ -' ~' "' INSPECTOR'S INITIALS RCO <br />OBSERVATIONS <br />This inspection was performed by the Division as part of its monitoring of Construction Materials 112 permits. The <br />operator's representative was contacted about the~inspection;~and.a date was arranged to jointly inspect the site. The <br />operators named on page one were present throughout the inspection. <br />The required permit ID sign was posted at the entrance gate near the highway. The boundary markers, though not <br />individually checked, were indicated by the operator tp:still be present and in their correct locations. There is no activity <br />yet in close proximity to the SE and SW corners, which have been"-seen in the past to be marked. There is, however, <br />activity near the NE and NW corners, and it is very important that these corner markers land even extra markers installed <br />midway along the boundaries) remain accurately and durably installed. (lt was mentioned that outside parties have mined <br />and processed materials here, and the site is open for outside parties to obtain material from their purchased stockpiles, <br />so it is important that the boundaries are well marked and understood by those outside parties.) <br />Some reclamation has begun, though it is limited to grading for slope reduction, mainly on the west end of the pit. Most <br />of the existing highwalls are vertical to 1:1 gradient. The highwall on the SE side of the pit is near the boundary and will <br />be sloped to final gradient soon. The pit will not extend much farther here, and it will not be daylighted to the river <br />bottomland. The operator must ensure that sufficient material remain unmined here for the 3:1 slope reduction to be <br />performed as part of final reclamation. <br />No recent mining has occurred, since there are numerous stockpiles of various materials available on the site. Some of <br />these stockpiles are located on the pit floor, though most material is stockpiled above the pit on the north side of the <br />permit. Some miscellaneous materials are placed in the' unmined NE corner of the permit. Mining will eventually be <br />extended to the north of the existing pit, but removal •of the existing stockpiles will have to be completed first. <br />Processing onsite is currently limited to screening of pitrun, and some screening of topsoil prior to replacement. There is <br />very limited parts and debris onsite, no contamination, and no noxious weeds. Some annual weeds exist on the older <br />stockpiles of fines and sand, and on disturbed areas. <br />This pit site prelates the 1991 issuance of the permit: Topsoil Fias been stripped from areas mined after 1991, but is still <br />in place on the unmined areas north of the pit (where the majority of~the stockpiled material is now locatedl~ Care should <br />be taken when removing the last of those stockpiled materials, to avoid undue topsoil degradation. Likewise, topsoil still <br />in place above the northern and southern side of the^pit must'be"stripped back a sufficient distance prior to gravel <br />extraction. Since the pit floor is getting larger and the floor will eventually require topsoil, the operator might consider <br />stockpiling topsoil down in the pit, or even spreading topsoil orrportion of the floor which will not be disturbed in the future. <br />Either of these activities may help keep the bond minimized. (Please try to carry out the required revegetation activities <br />on all areas which have been topsoiled.) .. <br />The need to update the Division's bond calculation was discussed. The current bond is 516,465.41, and will be regarded <br />as adequate until a new bond review is performed in the near future. As long as the mining plan is complied with, and <br />some amount of reclamation is carried out during mining, the current reclamation costs will probably be close to the existing <br />bond amount. The revised bond figures will be sent to the operator under separate cover. <br />The operator mentioned that they would like to expand the current 30-acre 112 permit to an 80-acre area. This will require <br />a permit amendment, which is submitted on a 112 permit application form with any amended exhibits attached (such as <br />maps, etc.l, and will require public notices to be published. The'fee"for a 112 amendment is S1,938. The application form <br />is enclosed with the operator's copy of this report." '~ ^~"-' <br />There were no additional items observed or discussed'" No problems exist at this time. All responses or questions about <br />this inspection report should be directed to this inspector at the Division's Durango Field Office. The address is: Division <br />of Minerals and Geology, 701 Camino del Rio, Room~125, Durango, Colorado 81301; telephone 970/247-5193, or fax <br />970/247-5104. <br />,ti, <br />Cont. ~ :>(, .. <br />,~: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.