My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
INSPEC33103
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Inspection
>
INSPEC33103
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:35:37 PM
Creation date
11/18/2007 10:40:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1995023
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Date
7/10/2006
Doc Name
Inspection Report
From
DMG
To
Corkle Construction
Inspection Date
6/19/2006
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINE ID # OR PROSPECTING ID #: M-rces_m~ <br />INSPECTION DATE: Clb/~9/C12 ~ INSPECTOR=S INITIALS: raP <br />OBSERVATIONS <br />I <br />i <br />1. This inspection was conducted as part of the Division of Minerals and Geology's monitoring program. <br />Present at the inspection were Kate Pickford, DMG and Harry Corkle, owner/operator. Weather at the <br />time of the inspection was clear, calm, and approximately 75 degrees. <br />2. A permit sign was posted at the entrance to the permit area, and the boundaries of the permit site <br />were marked. All previous mining activity at the site appears to have occurred within the permit <br />boundary. Topography of the site iri~licates that any surface water runoff would be contained on site. <br />There was no evidence of weeds o i the site. <br />3. The mine plan indicates that a slope of 3:1 or less will be maintained during extraction of material <br />except where material runs deeper There are sections of the site which have slopes of nearly 1:1 <br />consisting of a highwall approximately 150 feet long and 8 feet high which would have to be graded, <br />and two highwalls approximately 450 feet long and10 feet to 18 feet high, one of which could be <br />graded, the other would have to be backfilled due to it's location immediately adjacent to the <br />boundary fence of the site. Considering the grading and backfilling required to reclaim these highwalls, <br />the operation is still well within its bond amount. <br />4. A topsoil stockpile is located along the north boundary of the western portion of the site. There appears <br />to be adequate topsoil for the site, however, the stockpile is not vegetated. <br />I <br />5. An above ground storage tank containing diesel fuel is located along the western edge of the site. <br />There is to containment structure tocontain the contents of the tank in the event of a spill or leak. <br />I <br />i <br />I & E Contact Address <br />NAME: Harry Corkle ~ <br />OPERATOR: ~ <br />STREET: P n_ Rnx 306 ~ <br />CITY/STATE/ZIP: Wnlrian Cn RndRO <br />I <br />cc: r CE <br />T BL ~ <br />I' FS I <br />I' H W <br />I' HMWMD (CH) <br />r SE <br />I' WQCD (CH) i <br />T OTHER: Carl B. Mount, <br />DMG <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.