Laserfiche WebLink
as whether or not ARC remains responsible for property initially covered by its <br />permit was conveyed beyond its control, should not it be able to simply have its <br />DMG permit modified excluding the sold portion? Another question ARC poses <br />to the DMG is what effect upon its reclamation obligafion if the current owners of <br />the property determine that a variant of reclamation (as stated in its existing <br />permit) were agreed upon by the current owners. This question arises in light of <br />the fact the current owners aze exploring a potential future use that would not <br />benefit from the reclamation as currently stated in ARC's permit. <br />2. Water testing. ARC is unable to locate water testing conducted on this site. <br />During the tenure of this permit ARC has undertaken minor extraction activity on <br />site. ARC apologizes for its oversight to conduct water testing. <br />The impacr of this inadvertent oversight on the part of ARC to test the water <br />resulted in no noticeable or negative impact on the environment due to the very <br />low level of extraction activity. <br />3. Soil amendments. ARC is awaze from discussions with the properties owners a <br />future use is being researched and considered. The current owners have <br />informally expressed potential future uses. ARC in an effort to promote its <br />continuing interest to carry out extraction and other related Services to the owners <br />would like to offer them the most flexibility in final reclamation plans. ARC is <br />seeking to do business with the current owners and to maintain a favorable <br />position would offer soil amendments suitable to their future planned use. It is <br />possible the future use may benefit from an alternate reclamation plan. How <br />would [he DMG consider such alternative? ARC is also in the process of <br />exploring some if its own soil amendments originating from its site. <br />As we have discussed in past conversations the status of this DMG permit may not fit <br />squarely in the traditional permit mode. ARC is in discussion with the current owners <br />regarding future extraction. This processes has thus far proven to be quite slow. If you <br />have any questions I invite to you contact me so I might explain and discuss the DMG <br />concerns over this situation. This may have value to our company and I remain <br />committed to carrying out fhe agreements to be structured with the owners. <br />Please do not hesitate calling me at your convenience. <br />Sincer y, <br />John Keller <br /> <br />