Laserfiche WebLink
This was a partial inspection conducted as an OSM special focus oversight inspection on <br />Wednesday, October 9, 2002. Jim Burnell of CDMG conducted the inspection along with <br />Henry Austen of OSMRE , accompanied by Jim Kiger of Oxbow Mining LLC. The inspection <br />dealt with two separate special focus topics -public notification of blasting activities and <br />"small area exemptions" for sediment control. <br />The OMLLC records were checked onsight for the years 2002, 2001, and 2000, regarding <br />blasting notification. Verified records of publication were present for those three years and <br />residents within a half mile of the blast site were notified by certified mail. The notification for <br />the year 2001 included instructions on how to obtain apre-blast survey. That particular <br />paragraph was not included in the notification for the year 2002 and this was discussed <br />among the inspectors and the operator. No blasting was anticipated in the year 2002 and, in <br />fact, none has been done. Pre- blast schedules were publised for all three of those years <br />and discussion ensured as to whether residents within % mile of the blast OR'/z mile of the <br />permit area should be notified. Oxbow Mining LLC appears to be in compliance regardless <br />of the interpretation of that rule. <br />Small area exemptions (SAE's) were inspected. The Lower Hubbard, East side of creek <br />contained losts of sediment behind a silt fence that had been installed uphill of the site. (The <br />site is bordered by a canyon wall - a cliff -and water during heavy rains a watertall obviously <br />brings a good bit of sediment from the overhanging cliff and it's uphill area.) The silt fence <br />had been added to prevent gullying of the site itself and has been functioning effectively. <br />There was silt fence and straw bales at the downhill end of the site and some vegetation. <br />There was no sign of offsite impact. <br />The Lower Hubbard site, West side of Hubbard Creek is heavily vegetated because of its <br />aspect which is more favorable to plant growth. There were remnants of straw bales <br />remaining at the bottom, but no sign of off-site impact. <br />The upper Hubbard site -topsoil pile - is heavily vegetated and actually overhung by trees, <br />as it is located in the "bottomlands" of the Hubbard Creek riparian zone. There was no sign <br />of off-site impact. <br />Another upper Hubbard Creek site was listed as an SAE, but does not technically fit the <br />definition. Its inclusion in the list was an artifact of changing rules and standards. The SAE <br />consists of the outslopes of the Upper Hubbard Creek sediment pond, an area currently <br />exempted from the SAE demonstration requirements. Most of the Upper Hubbard Creek pad <br />drains into that pond; the pad itself consists of a graveled surtace with some vegetation. <br />The US Forest Service has requested that it be kept as a trail head for the Hubbard Canyon <br />trail, There are no issues of off-site impact at this location. <br />The Bear Creek SAE is found at the location of a former fan site for the old (pre-law) U.S. <br />Steel mine. There was some thistle growing on the site, along with bindweed. There were <br />straw bales along the perimeter of the site and this measure appeared to have prevented <br />any offsite impact, even from the abundant recent rains. <br />At the north end of the Elk Creek disturbance, there is an SAE located where Elk Creek flows <br />into the culvert beneath the Elk Creek facilities area. Much of the area is covered with very <br />coarse rip rap. The north end of the SAE contains several layers of silt-fence. The clear <br />water ditch around the Elk Creek topsoil pile also flows through that SAE and is equipped <br />with several lines of straw bales. <br />