Laserfiche WebLink
<br />(Page 2) <br />MINE ID f OR PROSPECTING ID f N-80-020 <br />INSPECTION DATE OS-11-95 INSPECTOR'S INITIALS CLK <br />Currently, Braley Sand 6 Gravel Co. ie going through Chapter 11 bankruptcy <br />(reorganization) and le also in the middle of a boundary discussion with the southern <br />adjacent landowner, Mre. Nellie Allis. The northern ten acres of the 89 acre site are taken <br />up with the offices, scale-house, and storage facilities of the operation; the southern 72 <br />acres which are actively part of the mining operation are divided relatively equally in half, <br />the eastern half completely mined, the western half currently taken up with topsoil and <br />overburden stockpiles. (See Hap) Near the southeastern corner two stockpiles not included <br />in the permit are placed: one of asphalt, the other of concrete. At this time, despite <br />undercutting of the berm separating Braley S&G from Highline Canal, there is no seepage from <br />the Canal, which has been a problem in the past. Sighting with a compass and doing rough <br />estimates of distances, the inspectors used the few markers in place and the boundary lines <br />described by the operator's representative to determine that five of the topsoil stockpiles <br />are currently outside the permit boundaries. Currently, it ie very difficult to tell what <br />etockpilee are topsoil, and which are overburden. No revegetation has been attempted anywhere <br />at the site, and only annuals such as cheatgrase and the perennial but short-lived knapweed <br />were found. <br />/1. A sign with the permit number and operations information was posted on the scale house; <br />v however, it was necessary to be well onto the site before the sign could be found. This <br />posting must either be moved or the permit number included on the entrance sign. (See Problem <br />5.) <br />2. The western and northern boundaries are ill-defined and need to be marked. Six posts <br />installed at the edges of the permit area would adequately define the site. (See Hap) <br />/ 3. Five topsoil piles have been placed outside the permit boundaries, on land owned by <br />/// Darlene Fehr. Either these pile moat be removed, graded down, or donated to Mre. Fehr, and <br />Mre. Fehr must accept these etockpilee in writing. Failing this, the Division may be <br />required to initiate an enforcement action for affecting land outside the permit area. This <br />moat also be resolved within 30 days. Clear boundary markers would prevent this from <br />happening again. (See Map and Problem 2) <br />The berm along the Highline Canal has been undercut, and the fencing along the upper <br />/boundary of the berm is collapsing. Backfilling of this berm must begin immediately, since <br />it ie a necessary barrier between Braley S&G mining operations and Highline Canal. <br />Compliance within 30 days of this inspection ie required; a photograph of the reinforced berm <br />sent to DMG would be adequate proof. <br />5. There ie no clearly designated topsoil storage area, and the topsoil and overburden piles <br />are piled at random throughout the site. Undercutting of these pile from mining, and <br />undercutting of adjacent boundaries along the southern boundary may necessitate refiguring <br />of the financial warranty in the near future. Roads over topsoil stockpiles were noted, ae <br />well ae bulldozer tracks; this is in violation of Rule 3.1.9(3) and (4) of the Colorado <br />Mineral Rules and Regulations. Since it was unclear exactly how much topsoil was stored at <br />the site, it is also uncertain that enough topsoil ie stored at the site to allow for full <br />reclamation. A clear map designating topsoil etockpilee' locations and volumes must be sent <br />to DHG within 60 days. <br />6. A copy of the new survey defining the southern boundary of the Bite will be finished <br />sometime in the near future. DMG requests that a copy be sent to us when it ie complete, in <br />order to update our records, and to ensure that the permit boundary is correctly located and <br />marked. <br />7. Concrete and asphalt being stored and processed at the site are not included in the <br />reclamation permit, and a technical revision for their inclusion in the permit mu et be <br />submitted to DMG within 60 days. Details of the maximum concrete and asphalt volumes allowed <br />on site at any one time, plans for their final disposition, and location on the site must be <br />included. <br />