My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
INSPEC32271
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Inspection
>
INSPEC32271
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:34:55 PM
Creation date
11/18/2007 10:35:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981025
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Name
Inspection Report
Inspection Date
4/17/2007
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
may have bridged across underlying rocks, but eventually collapsed. There were no signs of flowing <br />water having formed the holes (e.g., channel scour on the ground surface or sediment deposition in the <br />holes). Regrading and seeding the azea of the holes was discussed with the mine operator. This work <br />would use rubber-tired equipment for minimizing re-disturbance of the reclamation. <br />Collapse of Mine No. 3 Portal Closure - The backfill closure of Mine No. 3 has collapsed, creating a <br />concave depression on the ground surface measuring approximately 30 feet long X 20 feet wide X 8 <br />feet deep. No structures or voids were visible in the bottom of the depression. Stan Muhr explained <br />that last fall when he found the depression, he used a backhoe to knock down the sides of the <br />depression in order to reduce the hazard to livestock. He said that in the bottom of the depression he <br />could see what appeazed to be concrete sidewalls of the portal, which may have bridged the backfill, <br />resulting in the collapse. We discussed backfilling the depression so that material is not bridged to <br />ensure long-term stability. <br />Subsidence <br />There were no signs of subsidence from underground workings around the portal azeas. Snow cover <br />precluded inspecting subsidence beyond the portal areas. These areas will be inspected in an upcoming <br />aerial inspection and site visit, probably in June. Attendees on April 17 were offered the opportunity to <br />participate in the site visit. <br />Fish and Wildlife <br />Although no wildlife other than birds was seen during the inspection, evidence of wildlife use of the <br />reclaimed azeas was evident in the form of droppings (deer or elk), hoof prints, and browsed shrubs. <br />The mine site appeared suitable for wildlife habitat with North Thompson Creek's riparian zone <br />bisecting the area, and mixed aspen/conifer cover on adjacent hillsides. Adrake/hen pair of Mallard <br />ducks was on the Long Pond on the last day of the inspection. <br />Reveeetation <br />The mine site in and around the Water Development Area and on the Mine No. #3 portal bench has <br />good vegetative cover that is dominated by 4-5 foot tall Rubber Rabbitbrush, with Crested wheatgrass <br />and fescue as the dominant herbaceous species. Cicer milkvetch is an abundant forb. Crested <br />wheatgrass and fescue cover the refuse pile. The amount of cover appears adequate to control erosion. <br />No species toxic to livestock or wildlife were found. Weed problems were not evident. <br />General Mine Plan Comaliance <br />Upon completion of the inspection, the operator appeared to be in compliance with all aspects of the <br />mine plan. DRMS is reseazching compliance issues regarding the dischazge of Mine No. 3 water <br />outside the pond treatment system. The operator appeared to have fulfilled all reclamation obligations, <br />with the exception of the sinkholes on the refuse pile and the collapsed Mine No. 3 portal (see <br />preceding discussion of Slides and Damage). <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.