Laserfiche WebLink
ORIGINAL -PUBLIC FILE <br />(Page 2) <br />MINE ID # OR PROSPECTING ID #: ~~-taRn-gee <br />INSPECTION DATE: 4/2/Od INSPECTORaS INITIALS: ~_ <br />OBSERVATIONS <br />The Division conducted a monitoring and construction progress inspection of <br />the site on 9/2/04. Inspected the Phase IVC construction area. Only, <br />approximately 250,000 square foot of geomembrane liner is left to be <br />deployed. According to Mark all liner deployment is expected to be <br />completed by 9/2/04.Prior to Poly Flex departing from site, they also plan <br />to complet the liner along the Phase III area, covering approximately 1.2 <br />acres. Part of the area was approved under Amendment # 7 but was never <br />constructed due to shortage of clay and the other portion, was included <br />under Amendment # 8.A TR covering the area will be hand delivered on <br />Wednesday 9/8/04.The purpose of the TR is to track what was added during <br />this Amendment that was approved during the previous amendment. The foot <br />print of the pad and the total tonnage will remain the same as was approved <br />in Amendment # 8, no additional warranty will be needed. CC&V had objected <br />as to the Division requiring a TR for an already approved project. They <br />were notified even though the Division approved the construction of liner <br />in the area, under Amendment # 7, since it was not constructed at that <br />time, to keep a clean record of the events, even though the over all pad <br />foot print and tonnage will be as the MLRD BOARD approved Amendment # 8, a <br />TR is needed. <br />Clay liner, Geomembrane and drain cover were being deployed at the time of <br />the inspection. The deployed liner was walked and inspected no problem <br />noted. Golder QA/QC personnel were present at the time of the inspection <br />over looking the different areas of deployment. <br />Inspected the Phase I, IT, III AND IV pregnant solution collection areas <br />and recorded the following readings from the high and Low volume solution <br />collection transducers. <br />Phase I High volume solution collection transducer # 1 was recorded <br />at32.9#2 was at36.6 and # III was at 36.2. Low volume # 1 was at.22 and # 2 <br />was at .32. Piezometer for the pond was at 37.2.0 FEET <br />PHASE II AND III High Volume solution collection transducer # 4 was at 37.0 <br /># 5 was at 29.5 and # 6 was at 37.0. Low volume transducer # 1 was recorded <br />at .10 and # 2 was at .57. Piezometer was at 38.0 feet. <br />Phase IV High and Low Volume solution collection transducer # 7 was <br />recorded at 20.0 # 8 was at 19.2 # 9 was at 20.6 #10 was at 20.7. Low <br />volume solution collection transducer # 1 was recorded at 13.7 and # 2 was <br />at 7.1 inches of hydrostatic head. (ALL OTHER READINGS ARE IN FEET OF <br />HYDROSTATIC HEAD UNLESS NOTED) <br />Inspected the external pond, it was holding approximately the same amount <br />of water as observed last week. While in the area, collected the following <br />readings from the Low volume solution collection transducers for the pond. <br /># 1 was at 11.0 and # 2 was at 9.2 inches of hydrostatic head. Inspected <br />the under drain area all three pipes were discharging, the upper and lowest <br />ponds were holding some water, no problem noted. <br />