Laserfiche WebLink
<br />III. COMMENTS -COMPLIANCE <br />Below are comments on the inspection. The comments include discussion of observations made <br />during the inspection. Comments also describe any enforcement actions taken during the inspection <br />and the facts or evidence supporting the enforcement action. <br />Sediment Ponds 8 and 9 contained shallow puddles, as did Ponds 6, 10, and 1&2. Sediment Ponds 7, 11, and <br />13 were muddy, but did not contain standing water, as was the cases with containment sumps at CBA-1 and the <br />North Decline. <br />Drainage and diversion ditches and permanent diversion segments were in most cases in good condition; <br />however a couple locations warrant discussion. <br />First, a steep upper segment of the east upper diversion has downcut on one location, just upstream from the <br />location where two forks of the diversion converge. It appears that the ditch has cut down to sandstone bedrock, <br />and that measures to further stabilize the segment are not warranted. This location will need to be checked <br />regularly to ensure that the segment has stabilized. <br />Second, the permanent channel segment extending along the toe of the reclaimed explosives bunker road, down <br />to the junction with the lower end of the North Portal west upper diversion, and on down to the Haul Road 4 <br />culvert, and eventually to Coal Creek, exhibits minor erosion in several locations, despite having been graded <br />and lined with cobble rock prior to the most recent storm runoff event. Review of permit channel designs indicate <br />that there is no specific design for this channel. Upper portions of the channel are within the original native <br />ephemeral channel, while lower segments of the channel were constructed through alluvial fan material. <br />Apparently, when the explosives bunker road was reclaimed, a channel was constructed to replace the road ditch <br />along this lower segment, but specific designs were not developed. Flow within the channel is greater than was <br />the case prior to mining, because the east wing of the CRDA-2 upper diversion ditch intercepts a number of <br />ephemeral channels and diverts their flow into the explosives bunker channel upstream from the segment that <br />has been disturbed, and reconstructed. The Division will address concerns with the subject channel <br />segment in association with the current permit renewal review, and will request that channel designs be <br />submitted for inclusion in the permit, and that the approved designs be implemented in a timely manner <br />following approval. <br />French drain installation was in progress at the South Portals site during the inspection. It appeared that <br />installation of the drain segment that extends out from the concrete seal in the conveyor portal entry had been <br />largely completed. The 001 discharge dewatering pipe, which is no longer active, extends out from the conveyor <br />entry at the South Portals. This pipe will be plugged with pumped concrete grout in accordance with <br />specifications in recently approved TR-53, as a component of the South Portals reclamation project in progress. <br />Areas of concern along the Coal Creek permanent diversion segment have held up well during recent flow <br />events, including the riprap embankment protection along the banks adjacent to Ponds 6 and 10, and the riprap <br />grade transition segment near Pond 13. <br />Backfillina and Gradin <br />The various backfilled and graded areas were walked, and no slumping, cracking, or other signs of instability <br />were apparent. <br />Final reclamation backfilling and grading of the Light Use Road extending from the top of the RSRDA up to the <br />RSRDA soil borrow area, and beyond the borrow area to the permanent road above, was recently completed. <br />The grading appears to have been completed in accordance with approved plans. Likewise, final reclamation <br />grading of the water tank bench located above the lower segment of the light use road, south of the portal bench <br />had recently been completed, and appeared to be in compliance with the approved plan. It was noted that in <br />some locations, some of the track hoe gouges on the regraded slopes were not oriented properly (perpendicular <br />to slope). Given the short slope lengths in these locations, this is not likely to cause problems, but care needs <br />4 <br />