My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
INSPEC31642
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Inspection
>
INSPEC31642
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:34:26 PM
Creation date
11/18/2007 10:32:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977317
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Name
MINERALS PROGRAM INSPECTION REPORT
Inspection Date
5/9/1996
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Lloyd V. "Buck" Barnh~ t <br />212 W. 13th, Pueblo, Colorado 81003 <br />Office: (719) 543-1324 Home: (719) 542-9207 Fax: (719) 543-1329 <br />May 10, 1996 <br />MAY 13 1986 <br />Mr. Jim stevens ;;;,,;;;,;,;,;tMinerals&Geology <br />Division of Minerals and Geology <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Re: M-77-317, Cedarwood Clay Mine <br />Summit Brick and Tile <br />Dear Jim: <br />After our inspection yesterday, I came back and reviewed the <br />file on this operation, and also talked to Mr. Joe Welte, <br />Summit President. This shed a lot of light on this operation <br />that should clear up some of the questions. I apologize for <br />my incomplete knowledge of the background, but I have only <br />been involved with this pit in a minor way since 1994. <br />Attached is same of the correspondence that was used in de- <br />veloping the permit. The fiirst item I found was a letter <br />from Impact, Ltd., consultant for the original permittee, <br />dated October 28, 1977. The highlighted portions of the let- <br />ter emphasize that no use should be made of previously <br />disturbed areas around the mine for equipment storage or <br />stockpiling. It further states that "In order to obtain a <br />permit to mine the greatest amount of clay in the future, it <br />would, therefore, seem prudent to completely abandon any pre- <br />viously mined areas and move stockpiles and equipment on to <br />virgin land anticipated to be mined in the future under the <br />permit." <br />The second item was a letter to the Chairman of the MLRB ask- <br />ing for interpretation of the Rules and Regulations. The <br />highlighted portion states" The ruling in question is that <br />use of previously disturbed areas for stockpiling, spare <br />equipment, parking or haul roads would require that those <br />previously disturbed areas containing no commercial mineral <br />be included in the less than 10 acre figure for the mine. If <br />this definition prevails, it would be imprudent fior small <br />mining operations to stockpile or store equipment in previ- <br />ously disturbed areas, since a greater amount of the product <br />mineral could be mined under the permit ifi the equipment <br />storage and stockpiling were done on virgin land to be mined <br />in the future." <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.