Laserfiche WebLink
III. COMMENTS -COMPLIANCE <br />Below are comments on the inspection The comments include discussion of observations made during <br />the inspection. Comments also describe any enforcement actions taken dunng the inspection and the <br />facts or evidence supporting the enforcement action <br />This coal partial inspection began on September 15, and was completed on September 16, 2004. In <br />addition to the ground inspection, Harry Ranney, EPS, of the Division, took aerial photographs on <br />September 16, 2004. <br />Cam Duct items from previous inspection, included the following items: <br />• Ikkumcnts on tilt at the Routs Chanty ('uurt f louse were not checked during this inspection. During <br />the ('Dal Complete Division inspection ofluh 13, _'(10•l. the li~llowing documents ~+erc missing: <br />('oloradu Division of \~lincrals and (icnlug) U)ivisiun) Permit (\lining Permit Cuul l C-I~)RO•U01 <br />(the lindings document in support of the decision to renew the pemtit was on tilrl: [hc Ruutt County <br />Special l'se Permit(s) ~referencc page ' 01-37 of the Permit :\pplication Package I PnP)~: the report of <br />du June'_00.1 Division inspection, and the 4"' Quarter'_OOi and I"Quarter 2004 quarterly pond <br />inspection reports. <br />SIGNS AND MARKERS <br />No refurhishing ul the mine and permit idrntilication sign on the tikylinc access road t Roust C'ounq~ <br />Ri>ud )4/)from Roust County Road _'7 had lien made. (hher mine :.„d per.„it idemiticaliun >igns <br />were in e~cellenl c~~ndition. <br />fhc West Ridge pond <br />~+'as discharging at an estimated 0.11:> cts (I gallon pc:r 5 seconds) <br />the ('enter Ridge pond was discharging at an estimated 0.01 cfs <br />(I gallon per 10 sccondst. There Boas nu discharge from the <br />~toftnt :\rea Iwnd. Field measurements «ere taken of Trout <br />