|
+r. car~erra-caa~rr~
<br />Bebw aro oommerib on the The oonmerMS Yichide d4cuaYon d eE~erv~tlar nude duty the tnpectlon. Gbnrrrnts etw
<br />dnct6e airy enbrownert ad9uw talon duty fhe tMpectbn and the hrb d wid~oe at~paltp the erdaoemwt adYon.
<br />1) A copy of dre permit is in the Binder at Tab 1. It expires October 9, 2001 /
<br />2) On the top shelf The permit applicatitu w/revisions [the Permit Application Package (PAP)j consists of Volumes I,
<br />IA, II, and III
<br />3) Tab 1. The most tamrat Findings Doarment is far Permit Renewal Numbs 3,~fated January 14, 1997. `~
<br />4) Tab 7. The Dopy ofthe instaanoe oati8cate. policy nrmiber 1X15286, '~~r by>Ghe >~den.Cotapauy, expires ,~,,~/
<br />O }~ / Z / O ~ 8loy [~a/~ TseSvraa+ ~vo~i .~.t G,
<br />~ (Section 9 of the Binder) There are two bonds associated with this permit, tot er 1013366687, issued
<br />by Wells Fargo Bank, in the amrnmt of S 100,000, and Certificate 260001200,ussued-by the Bank of Colorado
<br />Western, in the amnlmt of 526,006. ~
<br />6) The partial Phase I bond release of S 161,994 was granted on 19 October 1995. The Lacy Laadout facility, part of an
<br />existing industrial perk, was tentaved fiom the permit by Technical Revision ('I'R}014 in 1997 (PAP, page 4-26).
<br />7) Av emissicns permits are rb longer required for this site.
<br />8) Section 14 of the Binder. The mine operated under Garfield County Special Use Permits (resolutions) 85-171 and
<br />90-083. Body of these resolutions have expired. Resohttian Number 91-091, 4 November 1991.
<br />9) Mining has ceased at this site, rm ccel is to be mined (PAP, page 2fi), thus notification is no longer pertinent.
<br />10) Other than proofing of the proposed (hydraulic) tntnrng method (PAP, page 4-3), no mining of coal took place at
<br />the site. Thus these is no requirement for subsidence monitariurg and no potential for subsidence.
<br />11) Tab 8. The most recmt Rill and Gully Survey on file is dated ~~ 19 y' 9 r7+- ~ . ~/~~? 9
<br />12) Vegetative monitoring is qualitative until Phase lI bond release (PAP, page 4.62). No monitoring data is required
<br />until that time. There has been m Phase II band release application.
<br />13) Specific variance approvals to not direct runoff fiom small arts of disturbed to sediment pond, along with
<br />altermtive sediment control measures, are described in the PAP (page 4-79). The only curreat requirements,
<br />straw/hay bales or sih 6eacing near the entrance to the site, era described in the PAP (page 4-58) a~ in the SWMP.
<br />14) Tab / 2 .The most tatrrent Annual Reclamation Report ~ file, submitted Ter. a r cw., is for
<br />~ 4 q 9 .Repots for the preceding year are by Febnrary 15.
<br />1~ Tab 1. The tnaac.wat~vlidberm Review Document is' red March 24, 2000. ~~ •+-~ .H ~ ;1 e ~ v.v• ~( .
<br />16) Tab .Three years (minimtmm) of inspection reports are cn file ( o z / 0 6 / 4 ~ in present). The
<br />date of the List inspection report m file is 8 J~~ ~-o
<br />17) l.acated i>K 0,,..1. / ~i-(r / . 'The original permit was issued to King Coal
<br />Campatry, which changed its name to New Castle Eoetgy Corporation The permit was then transferred m NCIG
<br />Financial, Inc. (Division letter of July 1 1, 1991)
<br />18) Notice of temporary cessation was provided to the Division by NCEC letter of Match 18, 1986. This ttotificetion
<br />(was~r~~ee) found on file. Since that time, the classification has been changed to Permanent Cessation. This change
<br />was not fi>tmd oa file.
<br />19) Section 9. The most recent reclamation cost estimate, in the total amount of S 125,847, dated 7 Jun 1996.
<br />20) A certified °as constructed" drawing of Pend A is in the PAP (Volume Tj as Figure 4.3~.
<br />21) There ate ~ large impotmdments for which annual certifications are regttaed.
<br />Papa ~ of ~ Popes, Date YG 2G , Initials ~,
<br />
|