My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
INSPEC30969
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Inspection
>
INSPEC30969
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:33:55 PM
Creation date
11/18/2007 10:29:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1976020
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Date
6/8/1998
Doc Name
MINERALS PROGRAM INSPECTION REPORT
Inspection Date
5/27/1998
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
(Page 21 • <br />MINE ID # OR PROSPECTING ID #M 76-020 <br />INSPECTION DATE 5/27/98 INSPEC:TOR'S INITIALS WHE <br />This inspection occurred during an MLRB tour of In-Stream operations in LaPlata County. David <br />King described the operation to the Board and answered questions from tour members. The <br />Thomas Pit is approved for gravel excavation from an overflow channel on the west side of the <br />Animas River and pit area adjacent to the west side of the river channel, material crushing, <br />washing and concrete production. The 112 permit is approved for 29.8 acres affected area. DMG <br />holds $26,295 financial warranty. <br />Material excavation activities did not occur during the time of this inspection, and did not appear <br />to have occurred recently. Mine entrance road and facilities area were well maintained and <br />appeared stable. Fuel storage tanks appeared intact, evidence of rupture or leakage was not <br />observed. Tanks were surrounded by spill containment berm. Affected areas appeared to be <br />contained within approved areas. <br />According to "Water Talk", of the Division of Water Resources, flow of the Animas River at <br />Durango was approximately 3060 cfs. At the Thomas Pit, river flow was pas:aing through the <br />overflow side channel. Mining equipment was not located within or near to the main river channel <br />or the overflow side channel. Turbidity of the water passing through the overflow side channel <br />appeared similar to or less than that of the main channel. Inslopes of overflow side channel <br />appeared stable. <br />NAME David Kina <br />OPERATOR Mountain Gravel & Construction Co. <br />STREET P.O. Box 788 <br />CITY/STATE/ZIP Dolores. CO 81323 <br />cc: Tom Gillis, DMG <br />^ CE <br />^ BL <br />^ FS <br />^ HW <br />^ HMWMD (CHI <br />^ SE <br />^ WOCD (CHI <br />^ OTHER <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.