My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
INSPEC30100
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Inspection
>
INSPEC30100
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:33:15 PM
Creation date
11/18/2007 10:24:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1991078
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Date
5/2/1997
Doc Name
COAL INSPECTION REPORT
Inspection Date
4/30/1997
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
.. ~. <br />III. COMMENTS -COMPLIANCE <br />Below are comments on the inspection. The comments include discussion of observations made during <br />the inspection. Comments also describe any enforcement actions taken during the inspection and the <br />facts or evidence supporting the enforcement action. <br />This partial inspection of the Hamilton Mine was conducted by Wally Erickson from the <br />DMG Durango office, 484 Turner Drive, Building F, Suite 101, Durango, CO 81301, <br />phone (970) 247-5193. No activity was observed, no mine personnel encountered. <br />Signs & Markers -Mine identification sign and safety signs were posted at mine <br />entrance. Perimeter markers were observed. Topsoil signs posted at stockpile #2. <br />Roads -Access to mine site is provided by Montrose County Road HH31 from Colorado <br />Highway 141. Mine roads were well maintained. Road side drainage ditches were well <br />maintained. Road drainage for mine entrance road is treated for sediment by silt fence, <br />silt fences were generally intact and appeared to be functioning appropriately. Road <br />culverts were clear of sediment and debris. <br />Hydrologic Balance -Sediment pond A, located at far north end, was dry. Primary <br />spillway was 4" PVC pipe with valve for controlling discharge. Debris guard for inlet of <br />primary spillway was absent. Primary spillway inlet and outlet were clear of sediment <br />and debris. Evidence of erosion at outlet of primary spillway was not observed. <br />Secondary spillway was open channel with riprap lining. Black impermeable fabric lining <br />was evident underlying the rock lining. Secondary spillway was stable, no evidence of <br />erosion was observed. Vegetative cover for pond embankment was sparse, however, <br />embankment appeared stable, evidence of minor erosion observed. <br />Sediment pond B, located at NE corner of permit area, was holding water. Water depth <br />was visually estimated at 2', water level was 3" below inlet of primary spillway. Two <br />Mallard hens were observed at pond B. Numerous deer tracks were present at water <br />line. Evidence of livestock located on pond embankment and pond inslopes. Two small <br />lizards were observed at east pond inlet. Primary spillway was 4" PVC pipe with valve <br />for controlling discharge. Debris guard for inlet of primary spillway was absent. Primary <br />spillway inlet and outlet were clear of sediment and debris. No discharge was observed. <br />Evidence of erosion at outlet of primary spillway was not observed. Secondary spillway <br />was open channel with riprap and vegetation lining. Secondary spillway was stable, no <br />evidence of erosion. Pond inlet on west side appeared stable, channel was lined with <br />rock and vegetation. Channel for east side pond inlet had been reinforced with silt <br />fence fabric, utilized as channel lining. Silt fence fabric had separated on channel floor, <br />evidence of minor erosion observed. Silt fence lining at east side inlet needs to be <br />repaired or removed and replaced with rock lining. Massive pond embankment was <br />vegetated and appeared stable. Weeds were observed on pond embankment. <br />Livestock pond, located at former position of sediment pond C, was dry. Pond <br />embankment, pond bottom and inslopes were well vegetated and stable. Spillway <br />structures for pond were not evident. <br />Revegetated areas were fenced from livestock and appeared stable, no evidence of <br />excessive erosion observed. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.