Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />• III III III~IIIIII'll <br />^ <br />=_ United States Department of the Interior <br />OFFICE OF SURFACE MINING <br />RECLAMATION AND ENFORCEMENT - ~ <br />,,~~,,,. SUITE 310 . ~ <br />6?a SIL\'ER AVENUE. S.«'. <br />~r ~~ BUQUERQUE, NEW MEXICO 87102 <br />~, n y ( ~ In Reply Refa To: <br />,,~~ ~'~. !~ ts~ •~ 2,• ~., ._.,' 4480 <br />~ ARR 1 `~ 1988 <br />~i ~J 1\ _L <br />.ICn_4PAA"r~11~ f`;V'.~•lr=~ Permit !i C-81-071 <br />Mine Name Eckman Park <br />4~F~ L Mines 1 b 2 <br />Mr. Robert Liddle, Senior Reclamation Specialist <br />Division of Mined Land Reclamation Department <br />423 Centennial Bui.iding <br />1313 Sherman Street <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />Dear Mr. Liddle: <br />The attached Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement <br />(OSMRE) inspection report identifies a violation(s) that is considered <br />to have existed at the time of the previous State inspection but had <br />'not been cited. <br />Date of Federal Inspection 03/23/88 Date of State Inspection 10/06/87 <br />Type of State Inspection: Complete X Partial <br />The determination that the State did not cite the violation(s) is <br />based on one or more of the following reasons: <br />The condition was identified in a State inspection report but no <br />State enforcement action was taken. <br />Design criteria or required certification has not been met for a <br />structure in existence as of the last complete inspection <br />(sediment pond, excess spoil fill, etc.). <br />Necessary controls that were required at the time of the last <br />complete State inspection have not been established (diversion <br />ditches, sediment ponds, top soil protection, signs and markers, <br />etc.). <br />R Site conditions indicate that the violation noted had been in <br />existence at the time of, or prior to, the last complete State <br />inspection. <br /> <br />Other (give explanation). <br />