My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
INSPEC29216
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Inspection
>
INSPEC29216
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:32:32 PM
Creation date
11/18/2007 10:20:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977392
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Name
NOTICE OF INSPECTION AND INSPECTION REPORT
Inspection Date
8/13/1985
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~_; <br />a <br /> <br />INSPECTION REPORT <br />FILE N0. 77-392 <br />DATE: August 13, <br />- PAGE 2 <br />1985 <br />OBSERVATIONS OF IMPORTANCE: <br />1. No activity on site at time of inspection. Only piece of equipment was <br />a Cat 955H front end loader parked next to a stockpile. <br />2. Site is as portrayed in the 1985 annual report. <br />3. Bench area has outslopes of 1.5h:1v and is infested predominantly by <br />Indian ricegrass on the outslopes and cheatgrass on surface. <br />4. Mining is southeasterly into a knoll. <br />5. Small, what appears to be pre-law disturbance on the southwest side <br />below the bench area. <br />6. Slides 5 From bench to southwest at "pre-law" pit of about 1 acre <br />6-11 From northeast rotating west to east at bench area <br />12 From access road east at site <br />RECOMMENDATIONS: <br />1. Division would like to remind operator that the reclamation plan calls <br />for slopes no steeper than 3h:ly. We realize the bench is being <br />utilized for overburden stockpile but are somewhat concerned about the <br />1.5h:1v outslopes. If this practice continues, a tremendous amount of <br />dozer time would be required to slope this grade properly. <br />2. Please address the about 1 acre disturbance on the southwest side. We <br />can find no discussion in the permit about when this activity occurred, <br />if it would be reclaimed, etc.. <br />3. The Division has no other concerns with this site and believes the <br />current financial warranty is satisfactory. <br />2666F/cj <br /> <br />.~ „ w <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.