Laserfiche WebLink
.; <br /> <br />~II ~I~~I~~I~~~~~~I~ <br />999 <br />TR9PP8R MINING INC. <br />January 22, 1997 <br />Mr. Joe Dudash <br />Environmental Protection Specialist <br />Colorado Division of Minerals and Geology <br />1313 Sherman Street -Room 215 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />Subject: Use of Parahafl Flumes at Trapper Mine <br />Dear ]oe: <br />During the Colorado Division of Minerals and Geology (CDMG) and the Office of Surface Miaing (OSM) Special <br />Focus Lzspection of September 3 and 4, 1996, questions were mired concerning the use of par;hall flumes at Trapper. <br />The CDMG and OSM questioned the sizing of the parshall flumes. <br />The par,hall flumes used at Trapper are sized to measure calculated peak discharges wiWin the drainage area. Due to <br />the intermittent nature of the drainages with the permit area, flumes must be capable of measuring the high, short- <br />term nmoff usually experienced in the spring months. The 12-inch throat parshall flumes are best suited to record <br />these levels, without the possibility of the flume capacity being exceeded. The attached table, from COIVTECH <br />Constroction Products, Inc. presents the capacities of available par,hafl flumes. As shown, if a smaller 9" throat <br />flume was used, a lower minimum flow maybe more accurately mad, but the maximum accw-ale flow capacity is <br />reduced. <br />Duriug 1995 spring runoff, Trapper measured runoff exceeding 3600 gpm a[ various NPDES points. This exceeded <br />the rocommended maximum capacity of the l2-inch flumes but did not overflow the flume. If a smaller 9-inch throat <br />parshall had been in place, it would have overflowed. A review of Trapper's Auuual Reports shows normal peak <br />discharges vary from 122 to 602 gpm. This is well within the rated capacity of the 12-inch tluoat flume. A smaller <br />9-inch throat flume could meet Wis same range, but would not be able to measure the extremely high flows as <br />experienced in 1995. <br />Smaller-throat parshall flumes more accurately measure low flow rotes. Due to We ephemeral nature of the drainage <br />areas at Trapper, peak flow readings are emphasized. Low flaw rotes are recorded, but may not be as accurate as <br />those obtained from smaller flumes. However for [he purpose of monitoring the seasonal variations of flows, the <br />parshall flumes in use at Trapper aze more Wan adequate for this task. <br />For the 1997 field observations, a smaller 2-inch throat Parshall has been purchased for use at Trapper. This flume <br />will be used during low flow conditions [o "calibrate" existing flumes at their lower stages. Asite-specific low flow <br />rating curve for the 12-inch flumes will enable the low flow rotes to be measured with more accurecy. <br />Please contact me if you have any further questions wnceming this issue. <br />~6AMv~?1'~~~i <br />giuision,a i~p~~~taa a,~eulog~ <br />Sincerely~,~~~ <br />Forrest V. Luke <br />Environmental Manager <br />FVULWH/DMEFLUME <br />enc <br />c file <br />P.O. Box 187 <br />Craig, Colorado 81626 <br />(303) 824-4401 <br />