Laserfiche WebLink
III. COMMENTS - COMPLIANCE <br />Below are comments on the inspection. The comments include discussion of <br />observations made during Che inspection. Comments also describe any <br />enforcement ac[ions *_aken during the inspection and the facts or evidence <br />suppcrting the enforcement action. <br />This was a partial inspection conducted by Kent Gorham of the <br />Colorado Division of Minerals and Geology. This former, contour <br />strip operation is bORd revoked. Inspection frequency is quarterly, <br />with one complete inspection each year. Ground conditions on this <br />day were dry in exposed areas and snow covered on north-facing <br />slopes. The weather was sunny and mild for March. <br />Roads <br />The steep section of the road leading south into Secticn 22 was <br />regraded last fall in conjunction with the ditch repair work. The <br />road was found in excellent. condition and was easily aassa6le. <br /> <br />'v . <br />_ Y <br />~,_ f.4u~: ~. <br />~i~.~iii~~~w <br />poking dcwn the road <br />nyorotoglc balance <br />The repair to the ditch Werth and east of reclaimed pond 15-P1 is <br />now complete, including reseeding. check dams were installed up to <br />the first upstream bend in the ditch and the inlet area to the box <br />culvert has been lined with riprap. It does not appear that any <br />appreciable runoff has flowed down the ditch. <br />Ponds 15-PB, 15-P20, 22-P5 and 22-P6 were all holding small amounts <br />of water. The water was clear and none of the ponds were <br />discharging. Pond 22-P4, as identified in previous inspection <br />reports, is more accurately defined by Map V-6 of the revoked permit <br />as 22-D3. This pond also held water and was discharging slightly <br />through the open channel spillway. <br />